Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Matthew O'Connor Jordan Binnington

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMatthew O'Connor: Save %, 0.912, 35th percentileMatthew O'Connor: Goals against, 3.00 a game, 2nd percentileMatthew O'Connor: Workload, 34.0 shots a game, 99th percentileMatthew O'Connor: Games, 1 games, 1st percentileMatthew O'Connor: Goals saved, -0.47 above expected per 60, 2nd percentileJordan Binnington: Save %, 0.750, 1st percentileJordan Binnington: Goals against, 1.00 a game, 99th percentileJordan Binnington: Workload, 4.0 shots a game, 1st percentileJordan Binnington: Games, 1 games, 1st percentileJordan Binnington: Goals saved, -3.18 above expected per 60, 1st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Matthew O'Connor G, OTT 2015-16 Jordan Binnington G, STL
1 Games played 1
0 Wins 0
1 Losses 0
0 Shutouts 0
34 Shots against 4
31 Saves 3
3 Goals against 1
0.912 Save % 0.750
3.10 Goals against average 4.69
Expected goals, while he was in net
2.5 Expected goals against 0.3
-0.5 Goals saved above expected -0.7
-0.47 Saved above expected per 60 -3.18
5.3% Chance per attempt faced 5.4%
Rating, in goals
-0.2 Goals above replacement -0.6
0.0 Wins above replacement -0.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean