Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Noel Acciari Garnet Hathaway

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNoel Acciari: Goals, 0.07 a game, 13th percentileNoel Acciari: Assists, 0.10 a game, 21st percentileNoel Acciari: Points, 0.17 a game, 14th percentileNoel Acciari: Shots, 0.83 a game, 6th percentileNoel Acciari: Hits, 2.76 a game, 97th percentileNoel Acciari: Corsi for %, 49.0%, 37th percentileNoel Acciari: CF% rel, -5.5, 7th percentileNoel Acciari: On-ice xG %, 54.4%, 83rd percentileNoel Acciari: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileNoel Acciari: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 16th percentileNoel Acciari: Shot quality, 8.5% a shot, 75th percentileNoel Acciari: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 46th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.04 a game, 5th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.15 a game, 31st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.19 a game, 17th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.85 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 2.15 a game, 89th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 44.6%, 6th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, -5.4, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 42.9%, 5th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 30th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 23rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 47th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentile
01234520Noel Acciari 5Garnet Hathaway 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Noel Acciari
Garnet Hathaway

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Noel Acciari C, PHI 2016-17 Garnet Hathaway R, FLA
29 Games played 26
2 Goals 1
3 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.17 Points per game 0.19
3 Plus/minus 0
24 Shots 22
8.3 Shooting % 4.5
80 Hits 56
16 Penalty minutes 44
10:22 Average ice time 9:08
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.0 Corsi for % 44.6
-5.5 CF% relative to team -5.4
48.4 Fenwick for % 43.4
54.4 Expected goals for % 42.9
+1.9 xGF% relative to team -7.4
60.0 Goals for % 50.0
103.4 PDO 102.5
43 Shot attempts taken 38
Expected goals, all situations
2.7 Expected goals 2.3
0.54 Expected goals per 60 0.59
8.5% Chance per attempt 7.5%
-0.7 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
+0.9 Goals above replacement +0.7
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.4 Even-strength offence -0.9
+1.3 Even-strength defence +0.4
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.3 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$793K Cap hit $690K
$159K Cap dollars per point $138K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate $1.1M
+$382K Value: worth minus cap hit +$362K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean