Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Kevin Stenlund Nathan Gerbe

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Stenlund: Goals, 0.19 a game, 54th percentileKevin Stenlund: Assists, 0.13 a game, 19th percentileKevin Stenlund: Points, 0.31 a game, 32nd percentileKevin Stenlund: Shots, 1.78 a game, 57th percentileKevin Stenlund: Hits, 0.59 a game, 26th percentileKevin Stenlund: Corsi for %, 48.4%, 26th percentileKevin Stenlund: CF% rel, 0.7, 51st percentileKevin Stenlund: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 63rd percentileKevin Stenlund: Rating, +1.6 goals above replacement, 42nd percentileKevin Stenlund: Chances created, 0.66 xG per 60, 31st percentileKevin Stenlund: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 17th percentileKevin Stenlund: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 67th percentileNathan Gerbe: Goals, 0.13 a game, 36th percentileNathan Gerbe: Assists, 0.20 a game, 38th percentileNathan Gerbe: Points, 0.33 a game, 35th percentileNathan Gerbe: Shots, 1.83 a game, 59th percentileNathan Gerbe: Hits, 1.53 a game, 74th percentileNathan Gerbe: Corsi for %, 46.7%, 16th percentileNathan Gerbe: CF% rel, -0.7, 36th percentileNathan Gerbe: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 44th percentileNathan Gerbe: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 30th percentileNathan Gerbe: Chances created, 0.65 xG per 60, 30th percentileNathan Gerbe: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 5th percentileNathan Gerbe: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 49th percentile
024681020Kevin Stenlund 10Nathan Gerbe 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Stenlund
Nathan Gerbe

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Stenlund C, UTA 2019-20 Nathan Gerbe C, CBJ
32 Games played 30
6 Goals 4
4 Assists 6
10 Points 10
0.31 Points per game 0.33
2 Plus/minus -7
57 Shots 55
10.5 Shooting % 7.3
19 Hits 46
8 Penalty minutes 22
13:59 Average ice time 13:45
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.4 Corsi for % 46.7
+0.7 CF% relative to team -0.7
50.1 Fenwick for % 50.6
51.8 Expected goals for % 49.8
+3.3 xGF% relative to team +1.8
56.5 Goals for % 38.2
101.2 PDO 94.8
77 Shot attempts taken 72
Expected goals, all situations
5.0 Expected goals 4.5
0.66 Expected goals per 60 0.65
7.1% Chance per attempt 6.3%
+1.0 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+1.6 Goals above replacement +0.9
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.3 Even-strength offence -0.1
+0.9 Even-strength defence -0.4
+0.2 Power play -0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.7 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$864K Cap hit $675K
$86K Cap dollars per point $68K
$2M Worth at the going rate $1.4M
+$1.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$714K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean