Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2020-21 season

At a glance

Kevin Stenlund Austin Watson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Stenlund: Goals, 0.16 a game, 42nd percentileKevin Stenlund: Assists, 0.16 a game, 29th percentileKevin Stenlund: Points, 0.31 a game, 34th percentileKevin Stenlund: Shots, 1.31 a game, 33rd percentileKevin Stenlund: Hits, 0.53 a game, 20th percentileKevin Stenlund: Corsi for %, 48.9%, 43rd percentileKevin Stenlund: CF% rel, 3.0, 79th percentileKevin Stenlund: On-ice xG %, 46.6%, 29th percentileKevin Stenlund: Rating, +1.1 goals above replacement, 41st percentileKevin Stenlund: Chances created, 0.66 xG per 60, 38th percentileKevin Stenlund: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 36th percentileKevin Stenlund: Finishing, +0.6 goals above expected, 57th percentileAustin Watson: Goals, 0.09 a game, 18th percentileAustin Watson: Assists, 0.21 a game, 44th percentileAustin Watson: Points, 0.29 a game, 31st percentileAustin Watson: Shots, 1.21 a game, 26th percentileAustin Watson: Hits, 2.94 a game, 96th percentileAustin Watson: Corsi for %, 45.0%, 11th percentileAustin Watson: CF% rel, -6.3, 6th percentileAustin Watson: On-ice xG %, 47.6%, 33rd percentileAustin Watson: Rating, +2.9 goals above replacement, 61st percentileAustin Watson: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 17th percentileAustin Watson: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 6th percentileAustin Watson: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 41st percentile
024681020Kevin Stenlund 10Austin Watson 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Stenlund
Austin Watson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Stenlund C, UTA 2020-21 Austin Watson L, DET
32 Games played 34
5 Goals 3
5 Assists 7
10 Points 10
0.31 Points per game 0.29
-4 Plus/minus -7
42 Shots 41
11.9 Shooting % 7.3
17 Hits 100
8 Penalty minutes 40
12:32 Average ice time 12:00
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.9 Corsi for % 45.0
+3.0 CF% relative to team -6.3
49.2 Fenwick for % 48.6
46.6 Expected goals for % 47.6
+1.4 xGF% relative to team +0.9
44.4 Goals for % 38.9
98.0 PDO 95.2
70 Shot attempts taken 71
Expected goals, all situations
4.4 Expected goals 3.7
0.66 Expected goals per 60 0.54
7.7% Chance per attempt 6.2%
+0.6 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
+1.1 Goals above replacement +2.9
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.5
+0.4 Even-strength offence -0.6
-0.2 Even-strength defence +1.9
-0.6 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.4 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$874K Cap hit $1.5M
$87K Cap dollars per point $150K
$1.8M Worth at the going rate $3.7M
+$968K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean