Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Kevin Stenlund Andrew Shaw

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Stenlund: Goals, 0.19 a game, 54th percentileKevin Stenlund: Assists, 0.13 a game, 19th percentileKevin Stenlund: Points, 0.31 a game, 32nd percentileKevin Stenlund: Shots, 1.78 a game, 57th percentileKevin Stenlund: Hits, 0.59 a game, 26th percentileKevin Stenlund: Corsi for %, 48.4%, 26th percentileKevin Stenlund: CF% rel, 0.7, 51st percentileKevin Stenlund: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 63rd percentileKevin Stenlund: Rating, +1.6 goals above replacement, 42nd percentileKevin Stenlund: Chances created, 0.66 xG per 60, 31st percentileKevin Stenlund: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 17th percentileKevin Stenlund: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 67th percentileAndrew Shaw: Goals, 0.12 a game, 28th percentileAndrew Shaw: Assists, 0.27 a game, 58th percentileAndrew Shaw: Points, 0.38 a game, 45th percentileAndrew Shaw: Shots, 1.77 a game, 56th percentileAndrew Shaw: Hits, 2.85 a game, 95th percentileAndrew Shaw: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 52nd percentileAndrew Shaw: CF% rel, 4.3, 86th percentileAndrew Shaw: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 53rd percentileAndrew Shaw: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileAndrew Shaw: Chances created, 0.87 xG per 60, 67th percentileAndrew Shaw: Shot quality, 9.0% a shot, 77th percentileAndrew Shaw: Finishing, -2.5 goals above expected, 25th percentile
024681020Kevin Stenlund 10Andrew Shaw 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Stenlund
Andrew Shaw

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Stenlund C, UTA 2019-20 Andrew Shaw R, CHI
32 Games played 26
6 Goals 3
4 Assists 7
10 Points 10
0.31 Points per game 0.38
2 Plus/minus -4
57 Shots 46
10.5 Shooting % 6.5
19 Hits 74
8 Penalty minutes 33
13:59 Average ice time 14:27
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.4 Corsi for % 50.7
+0.7 CF% relative to team +4.3
50.1 Fenwick for % 49.0
51.8 Expected goals for % 50.6
+3.3 xGF% relative to team +6.3
56.5 Goals for % 37.5
101.2 PDO 97.3
77 Shot attempts taken 54
Expected goals, all situations
5.0 Expected goals 5.5
0.66 Expected goals per 60 0.87
7.1% Chance per attempt 9.0%
+1.0 Goals above expected -2.5
Rating, in goals
+1.6 Goals above replacement +0.3
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.0
-1.3 Even-strength offence +0.7
+0.9 Even-strength defence -0.7
+0.2 Power play -0.4
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.7 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$864K Cap hit $3.9M
$86K Cap dollars per point $390K
$2M Worth at the going rate $890K
+$1.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean