Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2024-25 season

At a glance

Connor Ingram Jonathan Quick

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Ingram: Save %, 0.882, 8th percentileConnor Ingram: Goals against, 3.00 a game, 17th percentileConnor Ingram: Workload, 25.4 shots a game, 23rd percentileConnor Ingram: Games, 22 games, 8th percentileConnor Ingram: Goals saved, -0.32 above expected per 60, 16th percentileJonathan Quick: Save %, 0.893, 28th percentileJonathan Quick: Goals against, 2.92 a game, 22nd percentileJonathan Quick: Workload, 27.4 shots a game, 61st percentileJonathan Quick: Games, 24 games, 13th percentileJonathan Quick: Goals saved, -0.31 above expected per 60, 18th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 64 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Ingram G, EDM 2024-25 Jonathan Quick G, NYR
22 Games played 24
9 Wins 11
8 Losses 7
0 Shutouts 3
558 Shots against 657
492 Saves 587
66 Goals against 70
0.882 Save % 0.893
3.27 Goals against average 3.17
Expected goals, while he was in net
59.5 Expected goals against 63.2
-6.5 Goals saved above expected -6.8
-0.32 Saved above expected per 60 -0.31
7.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
-0.4 Goals above replacement -0.4
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
Contract
$1.95M Cap hit $1.275M
$675K Worth at the going rate $687K
-$1.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$588K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean