Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2025-26 season

At a glance

Connor Ingram Daniil Tarasov

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Ingram: Save %, 0.899, 57th percentileConnor Ingram: Goals against, 2.41 a game, 89th percentileConnor Ingram: Workload, 23.8 shots a game, 11th percentileConnor Ingram: Games, 32 games, 34th percentileConnor Ingram: Goals saved, +0.08 above expected per 60, 57th percentileDaniil Tarasov: Save %, 0.895, 49th percentileDaniil Tarasov: Goals against, 2.94 a game, 29th percentileDaniil Tarasov: Workload, 28.0 shots a game, 86th percentileDaniil Tarasov: Games, 33 games, 37th percentileDaniil Tarasov: Goals saved, -0.14 above expected per 60, 37th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 70 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Ingram G, EDM 2025-26 Daniil Tarasov G, DET
32 Games played 33
16 Wins 13
10 Losses 15
2 Shutouts 0
763 Shots against 925
686 Saves 828
77 Goals against 97
0.899 Save % 0.895
2.60 Goals against average 3.05
Expected goals, while he was in net
79.3 Expected goals against 92.6
+2.3 Goals saved above expected -4.4
+0.08 Saved above expected per 60 -0.14
6.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.7%
Rating, in goals
+10.4 Goals above replacement +5.0
+1.7 Wins above replacement +0.8
Contract
$1.95M Cap hit $1.05M
$3.5M Worth at the going rate $2.1M
+$1.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean