Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2025-26 season

At a glance

Connor Ingram Samuel Ersson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Ingram: Save %, 0.899, 57th percentileConnor Ingram: Goals against, 2.41 a game, 89th percentileConnor Ingram: Workload, 23.8 shots a game, 11th percentileConnor Ingram: Games, 32 games, 34th percentileConnor Ingram: Goals saved, +0.08 above expected per 60, 57th percentileSamuel Ersson: Save %, 0.870, 1st percentileSamuel Ersson: Goals against, 2.94 a game, 29th percentileSamuel Ersson: Workload, 22.5 shots a game, 1st percentileSamuel Ersson: Games, 33 games, 37th percentileSamuel Ersson: Goals saved, -0.45 above expected per 60, 7th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 70 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Ingram G, EDM 2025-26 Samuel Ersson G, OTT
32 Games played 33
16 Wins 14
10 Losses 11
2 Shutouts 0
763 Shots against 744
686 Saves 647
77 Goals against 97
0.899 Save % 0.870
2.60 Goals against average 3.12
Expected goals, while he was in net
79.3 Expected goals against 83.1
+2.3 Goals saved above expected -13.9
+0.08 Saved above expected per 60 -0.45
6.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.8%
Rating, in goals
+10.4 Goals above replacement -5.5
+1.7 Wins above replacement -0.9
Contract
$1.95M Cap hit $1.45M
$3.5M Worth at the going rate -$641K
+$1.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean