Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Brandon Tanev Shawn Thornton

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrandon Tanev: Goals, 0.04 a game, 6th percentileBrandon Tanev: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Points, 0.08 a game, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Shots, 1.06 a game, 17th percentileBrandon Tanev: Hits, 2.51 a game, 94th percentileBrandon Tanev: Corsi for %, 43.1%, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: CF% rel, -6.9, 4th percentileBrandon Tanev: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 10th percentileBrandon Tanev: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileBrandon Tanev: Chances created, 0.47 xG per 60, 7th percentileBrandon Tanev: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 10th percentileBrandon Tanev: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 30th percentileShawn Thornton: Goals, 0.04 a game, 6th percentileShawn Thornton: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileShawn Thornton: Points, 0.08 a game, 3rd percentileShawn Thornton: Shots, 0.84 a game, 6th percentileShawn Thornton: Hits, 1.04 a game, 53rd percentileShawn Thornton: Corsi for %, 39.7%, 1st percentileShawn Thornton: CF% rel, -12.4, 1st percentileShawn Thornton: On-ice xG %, 35.0%, 1st percentileShawn Thornton: Rating, -3.8 goals above replacement, 1st percentileShawn Thornton: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 6th percentileShawn Thornton: Shot quality, 4.5% a shot, 1st percentileShawn Thornton: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 45th percentile
012342040Brandon Tanev 4Shawn Thornton 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brandon Tanev
Shawn Thornton

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brandon Tanev L, UTA 2016-17 Shawn Thornton L, FLA
51 Games played 50
2 Goals 2
2 Assists 2
4 Points 4
0.08 Points per game 0.08
-6 Plus/minus -7
54 Shots 42
3.7 Shooting % 4.8
128 Hits 52
26 Penalty minutes 67
10:41 Average ice time 7:41
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.1 Corsi for % 39.7
-6.9 CF% relative to team -12.4
42.8 Fenwick for % 42.1
44.0 Expected goals for % 35.0
-6.6 xGF% relative to team -15.0
35.0 Goals for % 31.6
98.3 PDO 97.8
79 Shot attempts taken 78
Expected goals, all situations
4.2 Expected goals 2.8
0.47 Expected goals per 60 0.44
6.2% Chance per attempt 4.5%
-2.2 Goals above expected -0.8
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement -3.8
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.6
-3.4 Even-strength offence -3.4
+1.7 Even-strength defence -1.1
0.0 Power play -0.1
-0.2 Penalty kill 0.0
+1.5 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$874K Cap hit $600K
$219K Cap dollars per point $150K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate -$1.9M
+$367K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean