Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Brandon Tanev Vernon Fiddler

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrandon Tanev: Goals, 0.04 a game, 6th percentileBrandon Tanev: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Points, 0.08 a game, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Shots, 1.06 a game, 17th percentileBrandon Tanev: Hits, 2.51 a game, 94th percentileBrandon Tanev: Corsi for %, 43.1%, 3rd percentileBrandon Tanev: CF% rel, -6.9, 4th percentileBrandon Tanev: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 10th percentileBrandon Tanev: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileBrandon Tanev: Chances created, 0.47 xG per 60, 7th percentileBrandon Tanev: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 10th percentileBrandon Tanev: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 30th percentileVernon Fiddler: Goals, 0.03 a game, 4th percentileVernon Fiddler: Assists, 0.03 a game, 2nd percentileVernon Fiddler: Points, 0.07 a game, 2nd percentileVernon Fiddler: Shots, 0.81 a game, 6th percentileVernon Fiddler: Hits, 0.97 a game, 49th percentileVernon Fiddler: Corsi for %, 41.5%, 1st percentileVernon Fiddler: CF% rel, -8.4, 2nd percentileVernon Fiddler: On-ice xG %, 41.2%, 2nd percentileVernon Fiddler: Rating, -2.7 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileVernon Fiddler: Chances created, 0.32 xG per 60, 1st percentileVernon Fiddler: Shot quality, 5.2% a shot, 1st percentileVernon Fiddler: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 35th percentile
012342040Brandon Tanev 4Vernon Fiddler 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brandon Tanev
Vernon Fiddler

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brandon Tanev L, UTA 2016-17 Vernon Fiddler C, NSH
51 Games played 59
2 Goals 2
2 Assists 2
4 Points 4
0.08 Points per game 0.07
-6 Plus/minus -15
54 Shots 48
3.7 Shooting % 4.2
128 Hits 57
26 Penalty minutes 66
10:41 Average ice time 11:39
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.1 Corsi for % 41.5
-6.9 CF% relative to team -8.4
42.8 Fenwick for % 42.7
44.0 Expected goals for % 41.2
-6.6 xGF% relative to team -8.6
35.0 Goals for % 23.5
98.3 PDO 95.0
79 Shot attempts taken 80
Expected goals, all situations
4.2 Expected goals 3.7
0.47 Expected goals per 60 0.32
6.2% Chance per attempt 5.2%
-2.2 Goals above expected -1.7
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement -2.7
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.5
-3.4 Even-strength offence -4.8
+1.7 Even-strength defence +0.3
0.0 Power play -0.1
-0.2 Penalty kill -0.6
+1.5 Penalties +0.6
Contract
$874K Cap hit $1.25M
$219K Cap dollars per point $313K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate -$1.2M
+$367K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean