Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2023-24 season

At a glance

Brandon Tanev Lukas Reichel

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrandon Tanev: Goals, 0.11 a game, 26th percentileBrandon Tanev: Assists, 0.14 a game, 24th percentileBrandon Tanev: Points, 0.24 a game, 23rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Shots, 1.11 a game, 23rd percentileBrandon Tanev: Hits, 2.24 a game, 87th percentileBrandon Tanev: Corsi for %, 46.8%, 23rd percentileBrandon Tanev: CF% rel, -5.8, 5th percentileBrandon Tanev: On-ice xG %, 44.3%, 16th percentileBrandon Tanev: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 28th percentileBrandon Tanev: Chances created, 0.51 xG per 60, 9th percentileBrandon Tanev: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 40th percentileBrandon Tanev: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 28th percentileLukas Reichel: Goals, 0.08 a game, 14th percentileLukas Reichel: Assists, 0.17 a game, 34th percentileLukas Reichel: Points, 0.25 a game, 24th percentileLukas Reichel: Shots, 1.29 a game, 31st percentileLukas Reichel: Hits, 0.42 a game, 12th percentileLukas Reichel: Corsi for %, 40.7%, 2nd percentileLukas Reichel: CF% rel, -4.0, 13th percentileLukas Reichel: On-ice xG %, 37.6%, 1st percentileLukas Reichel: Rating, -4.0 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileLukas Reichel: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 13th percentileLukas Reichel: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 54th percentileLukas Reichel: Finishing, -3.2 goals above expected, 20th percentile
051015204060Brandon Tanev 16Lukas Reichel 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brandon Tanev
Lukas Reichel

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brandon Tanev L, UTA 2023-24 Lukas Reichel L, BOS
66 Games played 65
7 Goals 5
9 Assists 11
16 Points 16
0.24 Points per game 0.25
2 Plus/minus -29
73 Shots 84
9.6 Shooting % 6.0
148 Hits 27
51 Penalty minutes 12
14:35 Average ice time 14:07
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.8 Corsi for % 40.7
-5.8 CF% relative to team -4.0
45.4 Fenwick for % 40.7
44.3 Expected goals for % 37.6
-8.1 xGF% relative to team -4.1
48.9 Goals for % 28.8
100.9 PDO 96.2
125 Shot attempts taken 109
Expected goals, all situations
8.2 Expected goals 8.2
0.51 Expected goals per 60 0.54
7.5% Chance per attempt 7.9%
-2.2 Goals above expected -3.2
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement -4.0
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.7
-3.8 Even-strength offence -2.6
+1.2 Even-strength defence -2.4
-0.1 Power play -1.4
-0.5 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.8 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$3.5M Cap hit $925K
$219K Cap dollars per point $58K
$1M Worth at the going rate -$2.2M
-$2.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean