Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Dante Fabbro Cameron Schilling

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDante Fabbro: Goals, 0.25 a game, 99th percentileDante Fabbro: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileDante Fabbro: Points, 0.25 a game, 45th percentileDante Fabbro: Shots, 1.25 a game, 41st percentileDante Fabbro: Hits, 0.75 a game, 21st percentileDante Fabbro: Corsi for %, 53.2%, 83rd percentileDante Fabbro: CF% rel, 0.4, 54th percentileDante Fabbro: On-ice xG %, 51.4%, 65th percentileDante Fabbro: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 35th percentileDante Fabbro: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 4th percentileDante Fabbro: Shot quality, 1.5% a shot, 1st percentileDante Fabbro: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 71st percentileCameron Schilling: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileCameron Schilling: Assists, 0.25 a game, 60th percentileCameron Schilling: Points, 0.25 a game, 45th percentileCameron Schilling: Shots, 0.50 a game, 1st percentileCameron Schilling: Hits, 0.75 a game, 21st percentileCameron Schilling: Corsi for %, 45.8%, 12th percentileCameron Schilling: CF% rel, -5.3, 6th percentileCameron Schilling: On-ice xG %, 35.6%, 1st percentileCameron Schilling: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileCameron Schilling: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 1st percentileCameron Schilling: Shot quality, 1.6% a shot, 1st percentileCameron Schilling: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 56th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Dante Fabbro 1Cameron Schilling 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Dante Fabbro
Cameron Schilling

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Dante Fabbro D, CBJ 2018-19 Cameron Schilling D, WPG
4 Games played 4
1 Goals 0
0 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.25 Points per game 0.25
-1 Plus/minus 0
5 Shots 2
20.0 Shooting % 0.0
3 Hits 3
0 Penalty minutes 0
12:44 Average ice time 12:06
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.2 Corsi for % 45.8
+0.4 CF% relative to team -5.3
54.4 Fenwick for % 45.8
51.4 Expected goals for % 35.6
-4.2 xGF% relative to team -12.1
33.3 Goals for % 50.0
94.2 PDO 102.6
7 Shot attempts taken 6
Expected goals, all situations
0.1 Expected goals 0.1
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.08
1.5% Chance per attempt 1.6%
+0.9 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
+0.5 Goals above replacement -0.5
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.3
+0.3 Even-strength defence -0.4
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.0 Penalties +0.0
Contract
$925K Cap hit $650K
$925K Cap dollars per point $650K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean