Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

Samuel Girard Jackson LaCombe

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerSamuel Girard: Goals, 0.17 a game, 75th percentileSamuel Girard: Assists, 0.67 a game, 88th percentileSamuel Girard: Points, 0.83 a game, 92nd percentileSamuel Girard: Shots, 1.50 a game, 71st percentileSamuel Girard: Hits, 0.50 a game, 31st percentileSamuel Girard: Corsi for %, 48.4%, 42nd percentileSamuel Girard: CF% rel, -2.4, 38th percentileSamuel Girard: On-ice xG %, 53.5%, 60th percentileSamuel Girard: Rating, +6.8 goals above replacement, 85th percentileSamuel Girard: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 94th percentileSamuel Girard: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 95th percentileSamuel Girard: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 72nd percentileJackson LaCombe: Goals, 0.20 a game, 79th percentileJackson LaCombe: Assists, 0.80 a game, 93rd percentileJackson LaCombe: Points, 1.00 a game, 94th percentileJackson LaCombe: Shots, 0.80 a game, 35th percentileJackson LaCombe: Hits, 0.80 a game, 45th percentileJackson LaCombe: Corsi for %, 44.1%, 21st percentileJackson LaCombe: CF% rel, -5.7, 23rd percentileJackson LaCombe: On-ice xG %, 36.0%, 15th percentileJackson LaCombe: Rating, +7.5 goals above replacement, 87th percentileJackson LaCombe: Chances created, 0.38 xG per 60, 89th percentileJackson LaCombe: Shot quality, 9.3% a shot, 99th percentileJackson LaCombe: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 73rd percentile
012345Samuel Girard 5Jackson LaCombe 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Samuel Girard
Jackson LaCombe

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Samuel Girard D, PIT 2026-27 Jackson LaCombe D, ANA
6 Games played 5
1 Goals 1
4 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.83 Points per game 1.00
-2 Plus/minus -1
9 Shots 4
11.1 Shooting % 25.0
3 Hits 4
2 Penalty minutes 2
19:50 Average ice time 26:20
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.4 Corsi for % 44.1
-2.4 CF% relative to team -5.7
51.9 Fenwick for % 40.2
53.5 Expected goals for % 36.0
+0.9 xGF% relative to team -22.8
46.2 Goals for % 44.4
97.4 PDO 103.1
18 Shot attempts taken 9
Expected goals, all situations
0.9 Expected goals 0.8
0.45 Expected goals per 60 0.38
6.0% Chance per attempt 9.3%
+0.1 Goals above expected +0.2
Rating, in goals
+6.8 Goals above replacement +7.5
+1.1 Wins above replacement +1.3
+1.7 Even-strength offence +1.2
+0.3 Even-strength defence -0.5
-0.4 Power play +0.6
+0.5 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.3 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$5M Cap hit $9M
$1M Cap dollars per point $1.8M
$7.3M Worth at the going rate $8M
+$2.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$966K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean