Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Cale Fleury Gustav Lindstrom

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerCale Fleury: Goals, 0.02 a game, 18th percentileCale Fleury: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileCale Fleury: Points, 0.02 a game, 1st percentileCale Fleury: Shots, 1.10 a game, 26th percentileCale Fleury: Hits, 2.49 a game, 92nd percentileCale Fleury: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 54th percentileCale Fleury: CF% rel, -5.5, 8th percentileCale Fleury: On-ice xG %, 49.9%, 54th percentileCale Fleury: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 20th percentileCale Fleury: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 24th percentileCale Fleury: Shot quality, 2.1% a shot, 7th percentileCale Fleury: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 44th percentileGustav Lindstrom: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileGustav Lindstrom: Assists, 0.06 a game, 5th percentileGustav Lindstrom: Points, 0.06 a game, 2nd percentileGustav Lindstrom: Shots, 0.56 a game, 1st percentileGustav Lindstrom: Hits, 1.19 a game, 50th percentileGustav Lindstrom: Corsi for %, 44.3%, 8th percentileGustav Lindstrom: CF% rel, 0.2, 59th percentileGustav Lindstrom: On-ice xG %, 43.2%, 7th percentileGustav Lindstrom: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 19th percentileGustav Lindstrom: Chances created, 0.11 xG per 60, 10th percentileGustav Lindstrom: Shot quality, 3.2% a shot, 55th percentileGustav Lindstrom: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 40th percentile
00.20.40.60.812040Cale Fleury 1Gustav Lindstrom 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Cale Fleury
Gustav Lindstrom

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Cale Fleury D, SEA 2019-20 Gustav Lindstrom D, ANA
41 Games played 16
1 Goals 0
0 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.02 Points per game 0.06
-4 Plus/minus -6
45 Shots 9
2.2 Shooting % 0.0
102 Hits 19
6 Penalty minutes 14
14:21 Average ice time 16:32
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.0 Corsi for % 44.3
-5.5 CF% relative to team +0.2
49.6 Fenwick for % 45.0
49.9 Expected goals for % 43.2
-4.9 xGF% relative to team +5.1
42.9 Goals for % 22.2
98.5 PDO 95.3
102 Shot attempts taken 20
Expected goals, all situations
1.4 Expected goals 0.5
0.14 Expected goals per 60 0.11
2.1% Chance per attempt 3.2%
-0.4 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
-1.3 Goals above replacement -1.6
-0.2 Wins above replacement -0.3
-3.1 Even-strength offence -0.7
-0.3 Even-strength defence -0.1
0.0 Power play +0.1
+0.4 Penalty kill -0.8
-0.3 Penalties -1.0
Contract
$772K Cap hit $776K
$772K Cap dollars per point $776K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean