Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Neal Pionk Brent Burns

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNeal Pionk: Goals, 0.08 a game, 69th percentileNeal Pionk: Assists, 0.55 a game, 94th percentileNeal Pionk: Points, 0.63 a game, 92nd percentileNeal Pionk: Shots, 2.49 a game, 94th percentileNeal Pionk: Hits, 2.32 a game, 89th percentileNeal Pionk: Corsi for %, 51.5%, 69th percentileNeal Pionk: CF% rel, 4.4, 93rd percentileNeal Pionk: On-ice xG %, 46.9%, 29th percentileNeal Pionk: Rating, +5.4 goals above replacement, 82nd percentileNeal Pionk: Chances created, 0.27 xG per 60, 78th percentileNeal Pionk: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 51st percentileNeal Pionk: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 18th percentileBrent Burns: Goals, 0.17 a game, 94th percentileBrent Burns: Assists, 0.47 a game, 91st percentileBrent Burns: Points, 0.64 a game, 92nd percentileBrent Burns: Shots, 3.21 a game, 98th percentileBrent Burns: Hits, 1.03 a game, 40th percentileBrent Burns: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 49th percentileBrent Burns: CF% rel, -1.2, 41st percentileBrent Burns: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 35th percentileBrent Burns: Rating, +5.6 goals above replacement, 83rd percentileBrent Burns: Chances created, 0.39 xG per 60, 96th percentileBrent Burns: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 76th percentileBrent Burns: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 62nd percentile
010203040204060Neal Pionk 45Brent Burns 45

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Neal Pionk
Brent Burns

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Neal Pionk D, WPG 2019-20 Brent Burns D, COL
71 Games played 70
6 Goals 12
39 Assists 33
45 Points 45
0.63 Points per game 0.64
10 Plus/minus -22
177 Shots 225
3.4 Shooting % 5.3
165 Hits 72
32 Penalty minutes 34
23:23 Average ice time 25:25
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.5 Corsi for % 49.6
+4.4 CF% relative to team -1.2
50.3 Fenwick for % 48.8
46.9 Expected goals for % 47.8
+4.6 xGF% relative to team -1.0
50.0 Goals for % 44.9
99.8 PDO 98.9
240 Shot attempts taken 375
Expected goals, all situations
7.5 Expected goals 11.6
0.27 Expected goals per 60 0.39
3.1% Chance per attempt 3.6%
-1.5 Goals above expected +0.4
Rating, in goals
+5.4 Goals above replacement +5.6
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.9
+1.7 Even-strength offence +3.0
-1.1 Even-strength defence -3.4
+0.7 Power play +1.2
-0.8 Penalty kill +0.4
-0.5 Penalties -1.5
Contract
$3M Cap hit $8M
$67K Cap dollars per point $178K
$5.2M Worth at the going rate $5.3M
+$2.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.7M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean