Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Neal Pionk Ben Chiarot

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Neal Pionk D, WPG		2017-18	Ben Chiarot D, DET
	28	Games played	57
	1	Goals	2
	13	Assists	12
	14	Points	14
	0.50	Points per game	0.25
	-1	Plus/minus	15
	54	Shots	57
	1.9	Shooting %	3.5
	49	Hits	105
	12	Penalty minutes	32
	22:23	Average ice time	15:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	41.8	Corsi for %	50.0
	-6.7	CF% relative to team	-4.3
	41.4	Fenwick for %	50.4
	39.7	Expected goals for %	50.0
	-8.4	xGF% relative to team	-6.6
	48.6	Goals for %	57.6
	101.8	PDO	102.7
	73	Shot attempts taken	128
Expected goals, all situations
	2.6	Expected goals	1.8
	0.24	Expected goals per 60	0.12
	3.7%	Chance per attempt	2.1%
	-1.6	Goals above expected	+0.2
Rating, in goals
	-1.6	Goals above replacement	-1.7
	-0.3	Wins above replacement	-0.3
	-1.8	Even-strength offence	-2.0
	-0.5	Even-strength defence	-0.6
	-0.2	Power play	-0.1
	-0.6	Penalty kill	-0.1
	-0.6	Penalties	-1.8
Contract
	$925K	Cap hit	$1.4M
	$66K	Cap dollars per point	$100K
	-$433K	Worth at the going rate	-$446K
	-$1.4M	Value: worth minus cap hit	-$1.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean