Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Oscar Fantenberg Nate Prosser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerOscar Fantenberg: Goals, 0.07 a game, 59th percentileOscar Fantenberg: Assists, 0.26 a game, 66th percentileOscar Fantenberg: Points, 0.33 a game, 66th percentileOscar Fantenberg: Shots, 1.22 a game, 37th percentileOscar Fantenberg: Hits, 1.59 a game, 64th percentileOscar Fantenberg: Corsi for %, 47.6%, 22nd percentileOscar Fantenberg: CF% rel, -3.6, 16th percentileOscar Fantenberg: On-ice xG %, 41.5%, 3rd percentileOscar Fantenberg: Rating, 0.0 goals above replacement, 30th percentileOscar Fantenberg: Chances created, 0.29 xG per 60, 80th percentileOscar Fantenberg: Shot quality, 3.4% a shot, 72nd percentileOscar Fantenberg: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 51st percentileNate Prosser: Goals, 0.05 a game, 42nd percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.11 a game, 15th percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.16 a game, 20th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.47 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 1.05 a game, 39th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 42.7%, 2nd percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -5.8, 7th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 51.6%, 65th percentileNate Prosser: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 56th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.07 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 3rd percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, +2.1 goals above expected, 81st percentile
024682040Oscar Fantenberg 9Nate Prosser 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Oscar Fantenberg
Nate Prosser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Oscar Fantenberg D, VAN 2017-18 Nate Prosser D, PHI
27 Games played 57
2 Goals 3
7 Assists 6
9 Points 9
0.33 Points per game 0.16
2 Plus/minus 8
33 Shots 27
6.1 Shooting % 11.1
43 Hits 60
11 Penalty minutes 19
14:16 Average ice time 13:28
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.6 Corsi for % 42.7
-3.6 CF% relative to team -5.8
47.0 Fenwick for % 43.9
41.5 Expected goals for % 51.6
-5.8 xGF% relative to team -3.7
53.8 Goals for % 58.1
102.5 PDO 103.5
52 Shot attempts taken 73
Expected goals, all situations
1.8 Expected goals 0.9
0.29 Expected goals per 60 0.07
3.4% Chance per attempt 2.0%
+0.2 Goals above expected +2.1
Rating, in goals
0.0 Goals above replacement +2.6
0.0 Wins above replacement +0.4
-1.0 Even-strength offence -2.6
-0.3 Even-strength defence +1.8
+0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.4
-0.1 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$925K Cap hit $650K
$103K Cap dollars per point $72K
$594K Worth at the going rate $2.3M
-$331K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean