Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Adam Johnson Martin Hanzal

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAdam Johnson: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAdam Johnson: Assists, 0.33 a game, 72nd percentileAdam Johnson: Points, 0.33 a game, 38th percentileAdam Johnson: Shots, 0.50 a game, 1st percentileAdam Johnson: Hits, 1.83 a game, 82nd percentileAdam Johnson: Corsi for %, 48.3%, 34th percentileAdam Johnson: CF% rel, -1.5, 33rd percentileAdam Johnson: On-ice xG %, 50.4%, 51st percentileAdam Johnson: Rating, +0.4 goals above replacement, 26th percentileAdam Johnson: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 3rd percentileAdam Johnson: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 50th percentileAdam Johnson: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 52nd percentileMartin Hanzal: Goals, 0.14 a game, 39th percentileMartin Hanzal: Assists, 0.14 a game, 24th percentileMartin Hanzal: Points, 0.29 a game, 27th percentileMartin Hanzal: Shots, 2.00 a game, 66th percentileMartin Hanzal: Hits, 2.00 a game, 85th percentileMartin Hanzal: Corsi for %, 42.4%, 2nd percentileMartin Hanzal: CF% rel, -5.1, 4th percentileMartin Hanzal: On-ice xG %, 36.1%, 1st percentileMartin Hanzal: Rating, -1.1 goals above replacement, 13th percentileMartin Hanzal: Chances created, 0.83 xG per 60, 58th percentileMartin Hanzal: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 44th percentileMartin Hanzal: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 52nd percentile
00.511.52Adam Johnson 2Martin Hanzal 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Adam Johnson
Martin Hanzal

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Adam Johnson C, PIT 2018-19 Martin Hanzal C, DAL
6 Games played 7
0 Goals 1
2 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.33 Points per game 0.29
2 Plus/minus -4
3 Shots 14
0.0 Shooting % 7.1
11 Hits 14
0 Penalty minutes 4
5:18 Average ice time 12:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.3 Corsi for % 42.4
-1.5 CF% relative to team -5.1
47.8 Fenwick for % 42.7
50.4 Expected goals for % 36.1
-4.2 xGF% relative to team -14.5
75.0 Goals for % 33.3
111.7 PDO 96.5
5 Shot attempts taken 12
Expected goals, all situations
0.2 Expected goals 1.2
0.45 Expected goals per 60 0.83
7.9% Chance per attempt 7.7%
-0.2 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
+0.4 Goals above replacement -1.1
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.2
+0.2 Even-strength offence -0.2
+0.1 Even-strength defence -0.8
0.0 Power play +0.1
0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.0 Penalties -0.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean