Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Adam Johnson Daniel Sprong

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAdam Johnson: Goals, 0.14 a game, 39th percentileAdam Johnson: Assists, 0.14 a game, 22nd percentileAdam Johnson: Points, 0.29 a game, 27th percentileAdam Johnson: Shots, 0.71 a game, 3rd percentileAdam Johnson: Hits, 0.57 a game, 25th percentileAdam Johnson: Corsi for %, 46.1%, 14th percentileAdam Johnson: CF% rel, -4.1, 13th percentileAdam Johnson: On-ice xG %, 55.1%, 86th percentileAdam Johnson: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 26th percentileAdam Johnson: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 6th percentileAdam Johnson: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 35th percentileAdam Johnson: Finishing, +0.6 goals above expected, 64th percentileDaniel Sprong: Goals, 0.13 a game, 31st percentileDaniel Sprong: Assists, 0.13 a game, 19th percentileDaniel Sprong: Points, 0.25 a game, 22nd percentileDaniel Sprong: Shots, 2.13 a game, 69th percentileDaniel Sprong: Hits, 0.50 a game, 19th percentileDaniel Sprong: Corsi for %, 55.8%, 95th percentileDaniel Sprong: CF% rel, 8.2, 99th percentileDaniel Sprong: On-ice xG %, 56.8%, 94th percentileDaniel Sprong: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 29th percentileDaniel Sprong: Chances created, 0.78 xG per 60, 52nd percentileDaniel Sprong: Shot quality, 5.9% a shot, 2nd percentileDaniel Sprong: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 49th percentile
00.511.52Adam Johnson 2Daniel Sprong 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Adam Johnson
Daniel Sprong

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Adam Johnson C, PIT 2019-20 Daniel Sprong R, NJD
7 Games played 8
1 Goals 1
1 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.29 Points per game 0.25
-1 Plus/minus -2
5 Shots 17
20.0 Shooting % 5.9
4 Hits 4
2 Penalty minutes 0
6:42 Average ice time 14:06
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.1 Corsi for % 55.8
-4.1 CF% relative to team +8.2
48.3 Fenwick for % 57.7
55.1 Expected goals for % 56.8
+7.1 xGF% relative to team +12.9
42.9 Goals for % 50.0
94.6 PDO 98.7
6 Shot attempts taken 25
Expected goals, all situations
0.4 Expected goals 1.5
0.49 Expected goals per 60 0.78
7.6% Chance per attempt 5.9%
+0.6 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+0.5 Goals above replacement +0.8
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.1
+0.1 Even-strength offence +0.3
+0.5 Even-strength defence -0.1
0.0 Power play +0.1
0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.2 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$700K Cap hit $750K
$350K Cap dollars per point $375K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean