Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2023-24 season

At a glance

Zach Whitecloud Nate Schmidt

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerZach Whitecloud: Goals, 0.03 a game, 28th percentileZach Whitecloud: Assists, 0.20 a game, 46th percentileZach Whitecloud: Points, 0.23 a game, 39th percentileZach Whitecloud: Shots, 0.84 a game, 20th percentileZach Whitecloud: Hits, 2.11 a game, 84th percentileZach Whitecloud: Corsi for %, 48.2%, 35th percentileZach Whitecloud: CF% rel, -0.6, 46th percentileZach Whitecloud: On-ice xG %, 54.6%, 86th percentileZach Whitecloud: Rating, +5.5 goals above replacement, 81st percentileZach Whitecloud: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 30th percentileZach Whitecloud: Shot quality, 3.3% a shot, 52nd percentileZach Whitecloud: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 42nd percentileNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.03 a game, 27th percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.19 a game, 41st percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.22 a game, 37th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.19 a game, 51st percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 1.05 a game, 44th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 52.4%, 76th percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 0.6, 58th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 55.3%, 90th percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +2.7 goals above replacement, 66th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 72nd percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.7% a shot, 71st percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 12th percentile
0510204060Zach Whitecloud 14Nate Schmidt 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Zach Whitecloud
Nate Schmidt

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Zach Whitecloud D, CGY 2023-24 Nate Schmidt D, UTA
61 Games played 63
2 Goals 2
12 Assists 12
14 Points 14
0.23 Points per game 0.22
-3 Plus/minus 10
51 Shots 75
3.9 Shooting % 2.7
129 Hits 66
32 Penalty minutes 16
17:35 Average ice time 16:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.2 Corsi for % 52.4
-0.6 CF% relative to team +0.6
48.3 Fenwick for % 53.5
54.6 Expected goals for % 55.3
+3.3 xGF% relative to team +2.4
47.9 Goals for % 57.4
99.4 PDO 100.9
131 Shot attempts taken 136
Expected goals, all situations
2.6 Expected goals 4.2
0.14 Expected goals per 60 0.24
3.3% Chance per attempt 3.7%
-0.6 Goals above expected -2.2
Rating, in goals
+5.5 Goals above replacement +2.7
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.4
-2.6 Even-strength offence -2.6
+5.0 Even-strength defence +3.3
-0.1 Power play -1.0
-0.2 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.2 Penalties -0.4
Contract
$2.75M Cap hit $5.95M
$196K Cap dollars per point $425K
$4.9M Worth at the going rate $2.8M
+$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean