Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Par Lindholm Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPar Lindholm: Goals, 0.02 a game, 2nd percentilePar Lindholm: Assists, 0.18 a game, 37th percentilePar Lindholm: Points, 0.20 a game, 14th percentilePar Lindholm: Shots, 1.00 a game, 12th percentilePar Lindholm: Hits, 0.89 a game, 44th percentilePar Lindholm: Corsi for %, 47.3%, 21st percentilePar Lindholm: CF% rel, -5.0, 5th percentilePar Lindholm: On-ice xG %, 47.0%, 24th percentilePar Lindholm: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 40th percentilePar Lindholm: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 14th percentilePar Lindholm: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 7th percentilePar Lindholm: Finishing, -6.0 goals above expected, 5th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 10th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.10 a game, 11th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.17 a game, 7th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 0.91 a game, 8th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.12 a game, 57th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 14th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.9, 5th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 45.0%, 13th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, -2.4 goals above replacement, 4th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.36 xG per 60, 1st percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 24th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 34th percentile
0510204060Par Lindholm 13Nate Thompson 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Par Lindholm
Nate Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Par Lindholm C, BOS 2018-19 Nate Thompson C, PHI
65 Games played 78
1 Goals 5
12 Assists 8
13 Points 13
0.20 Points per game 0.17
5 Plus/minus -1
65 Shots 71
1.5 Shooting % 7.0
58 Hits 87
18 Penalty minutes 17
11:21 Average ice time 13:00
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.3 Corsi for % 46.3
-5.0 CF% relative to team -4.9
45.9 Fenwick for % 45.4
47.0 Expected goals for % 45.0
-4.9 xGF% relative to team -6.8
57.1 Goals for % 48.0
104.0 PDO 100.2
126 Shot attempts taken 94
Expected goals, all situations
7.0 Expected goals 6.1
0.57 Expected goals per 60 0.36
6.4% Chance per attempt 7.1%
-6.0 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+1.8 Goals above replacement -2.4
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.4
-3.0 Even-strength offence -7.2
+3.6 Even-strength defence +1.7
-0.1 Power play -0.3
-0.2 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.4 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$925K Cap hit $1.65M
$71K Cap dollars per point $127K
$1.9M Worth at the going rate -$993K
+$961K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean