Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

Akira Schmid Clay Stevenson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerAkira Schmid: Save %, 0.875, 33rd percentileAkira Schmid: Goals against, 4.00 a game, 14th percentileAkira Schmid: Workload, 32.0 shots a game, 86th percentileAkira Schmid: Games, 1 games, 1st percentileAkira Schmid: Goals saved, -0.29 above expected per 60, 1st percentileClay Stevenson: Save %, 0.875, 33rd percentileClay Stevenson: Goals against, 3.00 a game, 29th percentileClay Stevenson: Workload, 24.0 shots a game, 41st percentileClay Stevenson: Games, 2 games, 1st percentileClay Stevenson: Goals saved, -0.42 above expected per 60, 1st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 51 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Akira Schmid G, FLA 2026-27 Clay Stevenson G, WPG
1 Games played 2
0 Wins 1
0 Losses 1
0 Shutouts 0
32 Shots against 48
28 Saves 42
4 Goals against 6
0.875 Save % 0.875
3.80 Goals against average 3.10
Expected goals, while he was in net
3.7 Expected goals against 5.2
-0.3 Goals saved above expected -0.8
-0.29 Saved above expected per 60 -0.42
7.7% Chance per attempt faced 6.7%
Rating, in goals
+3.0 Goals above replacement +0.2
+0.5 Wins above replacement +0.0
Contract
$2M Cap hit $850K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean