Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

Blake Lizotte Egor Chinakhov

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBlake Lizotte: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBlake Lizotte: Assists, 0.33 a game, 60th percentileBlake Lizotte: Points, 0.33 a game, 35th percentileBlake Lizotte: Shots, 1.17 a game, 34th percentileBlake Lizotte: Hits, 0.50 a game, 21st percentileBlake Lizotte: Corsi for %, 56.1%, 77th percentileBlake Lizotte: CF% rel, 7.7, 84th percentileBlake Lizotte: On-ice xG %, 67.6%, 94th percentileBlake Lizotte: Rating, +2.2 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileBlake Lizotte: Chances created, 0.77 xG per 60, 49th percentileBlake Lizotte: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 49th percentileBlake Lizotte: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 14th percentileEgor Chinakhov: Goals, 0.17 a game, 42nd percentileEgor Chinakhov: Assists, 0.17 a game, 34th percentileEgor Chinakhov: Points, 0.33 a game, 35th percentileEgor Chinakhov: Shots, 2.00 a game, 68th percentileEgor Chinakhov: Hits, 0.50 a game, 21st percentileEgor Chinakhov: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 49th percentileEgor Chinakhov: CF% rel, 0.5, 48th percentileEgor Chinakhov: On-ice xG %, 45.9%, 35th percentileEgor Chinakhov: Rating, +2.9 goals above replacement, 51st percentileEgor Chinakhov: Chances created, 1.05 xG per 60, 72nd percentileEgor Chinakhov: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 49th percentileEgor Chinakhov: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 25th percentile
00.511.52Blake Lizotte 2Egor Chinakhov 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Blake Lizotte
Egor Chinakhov

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Blake Lizotte C, PIT 2026-27 Egor Chinakhov R, PIT
6 Games played 6
0 Goals 1
2 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.33 Points per game 0.33
0 Plus/minus -1
7 Shots 12
0.0 Shooting % 8.3
3 Hits 3
4 Penalty minutes 2
12:52 Average ice time 15:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
56.1 Corsi for % 50.3
+7.7 CF% relative to team +0.5
58.4 Fenwick for % 50.0
67.6 Expected goals for % 45.9
+17.6 xGF% relative to team -9.2
75.0 Goals for % 50.0
104.7 PDO 100.5
12 Shot attempts taken 19
Expected goals, all situations
1.0 Expected goals 1.7
0.77 Expected goals per 60 1.05
8.3% Chance per attempt 8.3%
-1.0 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
+2.2 Goals above replacement +2.9
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.5
-1.7 Even-strength offence +0.6
+2.7 Even-strength defence -0.9
+0.1 Power play -0.3
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-1.0 Penalties +1.3
Contract
$2.25M Cap hit $6.25M
$1.125M Cap dollars per point $3.125M
$2.9M Worth at the going rate $3.6M
+$677K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean