Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2025-26 season

At a glance

Arturs Silovs Jordan Binnington

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerArturs Silovs: Save %, 0.888, 30th percentileArturs Silovs: Goals against, 2.95 a game, 27th percentileArturs Silovs: Workload, 26.2 shots a game, 43rd percentileArturs Silovs: Games, 39 games, 53rd percentileArturs Silovs: Goals saved, -0.23 above expected per 60, 28th percentileJordan Binnington: Save %, 0.873, 7th percentileJordan Binnington: Goals against, 3.12 a game, 14th percentileJordan Binnington: Workload, 24.6 shots a game, 21st percentileJordan Binnington: Games, 41 games, 60th percentileJordan Binnington: Goals saved, -0.74 above expected per 60, 1st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 70 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Arturs Silovs G, PIT 2025-26 Jordan Binnington G, STL
39 Games played 41
19 Wins 13
12 Losses 20
2 Shutouts 1
1,020 Shots against 1,010
906 Saves 882
115 Goals against 128
0.888 Save % 0.873
3.07 Goals against average 3.33
Expected goals, while he was in net
106.3 Expected goals against 99.6
-8.7 Goals saved above expected -28.4
-0.23 Saved above expected per 60 -0.74
6.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.7%
Rating, in goals
+2.2 Goals above replacement -18.2
+0.4 Wins above replacement -3.0
Contract
$850K Cap hit $6M
$1.3M Worth at the going rate -$3.9M
+$485K Value: worth minus cap hit -$9.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean