Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2021-22 season

At a glance

Mike Hardman Lias Andersson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMike Hardman: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMike Hardman: Assists, 0.10 a game, 12th percentileMike Hardman: Points, 0.10 a game, 3rd percentileMike Hardman: Shots, 0.57 a game, 1st percentileMike Hardman: Hits, 2.86 a game, 95th percentileMike Hardman: Corsi for %, 39.4%, 1st percentileMike Hardman: CF% rel, -8.5, 1st percentileMike Hardman: On-ice xG %, 44.2%, 12th percentileMike Hardman: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 21st percentileMike Hardman: Chances created, 0.51 xG per 60, 6th percentileMike Hardman: Shot quality, 8.8% a shot, 67th percentileMike Hardman: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 38th percentileLias Andersson: Goals, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileLias Andersson: Assists, 0.05 a game, 3rd percentileLias Andersson: Points, 0.10 a game, 4th percentileLias Andersson: Shots, 1.45 a game, 38th percentileLias Andersson: Hits, 1.15 a game, 55th percentileLias Andersson: Corsi for %, 47.2%, 27th percentileLias Andersson: CF% rel, -5.7, 6th percentileLias Andersson: On-ice xG %, 44.9%, 15th percentileLias Andersson: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 10th percentileLias Andersson: Chances created, 0.92 xG per 60, 65th percentileLias Andersson: Shot quality, 9.9% a shot, 91st percentileLias Andersson: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
00.511.5220Mike Hardman 2Lias Andersson 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mike Hardman
Lias Andersson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mike Hardman L, NJD 2021-22 Lias Andersson C, LAK
21 Games played 20
0 Goals 1
2 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.10 Points per game 0.10
-6 Plus/minus -7
12 Shots 29
0.0 Shooting % 3.4
60 Hits 23
11 Penalty minutes 12
9:18 Average ice time 10:37
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
39.4 Corsi for % 47.2
-8.5 CF% relative to team -5.7
37.9 Fenwick for % 47.0
44.2 Expected goals for % 44.9
-0.8 xGF% relative to team -7.4
31.3 Goals for % 23.1
97.2 PDO 93.7
24 Shot attempts taken 37
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 3.3
0.51 Expected goals per 60 0.92
8.8% Chance per attempt 9.9%
-1.7 Goals above expected -2.3
Rating, in goals
-0.3 Goals above replacement -1.6
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.3
-0.9 Even-strength offence -0.8
+0.4 Even-strength defence -1.8
0.0 Power play +0.2
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.3 Penalties +0.0
Contract
$913K Cap hit $874K
$456K Cap dollars per point $437K
$462K Worth at the going rate -$480K
-$450K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean