Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2025-26 season

At a glance

Emil Lilleberg Neal Pionk

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerEmil Lilleberg: Goals, 0.08 a game, 66th percentileEmil Lilleberg: Assists, 0.16 a game, 29th percentileEmil Lilleberg: Points, 0.24 a game, 44th percentileEmil Lilleberg: Shots, 0.86 a game, 29th percentileEmil Lilleberg: Hits, 1.92 a game, 90th percentileEmil Lilleberg: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 68th percentileEmil Lilleberg: CF% rel, -2.2, 25th percentileEmil Lilleberg: On-ice xG %, 54.4%, 82nd percentileEmil Lilleberg: Rating, +1.4 goals above replacement, 50th percentileEmil Lilleberg: Chances created, 0.21 xG per 60, 57th percentileEmil Lilleberg: Shot quality, 4.3% a shot, 81st percentileEmil Lilleberg: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 67th percentileNeal Pionk: Goals, 0.06 a game, 51st percentileNeal Pionk: Assists, 0.18 a game, 35th percentileNeal Pionk: Points, 0.24 a game, 42nd percentileNeal Pionk: Shots, 1.90 a game, 86th percentileNeal Pionk: Hits, 2.18 a game, 95th percentileNeal Pionk: Corsi for %, 49.0%, 47th percentileNeal Pionk: CF% rel, -0.9, 45th percentileNeal Pionk: On-ice xG %, 46.9%, 24th percentileNeal Pionk: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileNeal Pionk: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 49th percentileNeal Pionk: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 19th percentileNeal Pionk: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 33rd percentile
05102040Emil Lilleberg 12Neal Pionk 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Emil Lilleberg
Neal Pionk

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Emil Lilleberg D, TBL 2025-26 Neal Pionk D, WPG
50 Games played 51
4 Goals 3
8 Assists 9
12 Points 12
0.24 Points per game 0.24
15 Plus/minus 1
43 Shots 97
9.3 Shooting % 3.1
96 Hits 111
61 Penalty minutes 37
17:18 Average ice time 22:43
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.4 Corsi for % 49.0
-2.2 CF% relative to team -0.9
51.3 Fenwick for % 49.0
54.4 Expected goals for % 46.9
-0.9 xGF% relative to team -0.8
59.4 Goals for % 53.0
103.1 PDO 101.7
95 Shot attempts taken 157
Expected goals, all situations
3.0 Expected goals 3.8
0.21 Expected goals per 60 0.20
4.3% Chance per attempt 2.6%
+1.0 Goals above expected -0.8
Rating, in goals
+1.4 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.0
-1.1 Even-strength offence -2.1
+0.3 Even-strength defence -1.1
0.0 Power play -0.7
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.2
-1.0 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$800K Cap hit $7M
$67K Cap dollars per point $583K
$2M Worth at the going rate $834K
+$1.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$6.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean