Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

Nate Danielson A.J. Greer

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Danielson: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNate Danielson: Assists, 0.20 a game, 39th percentileNate Danielson: Points, 0.20 a game, 22nd percentileNate Danielson: Shots, 0.60 a game, 11th percentileNate Danielson: Hits, 0.60 a game, 26th percentileNate Danielson: Corsi for %, 52.1%, 60th percentileNate Danielson: CF% rel, -3.0, 33rd percentileNate Danielson: On-ice xG %, 52.5%, 54th percentileNate Danielson: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 10th percentileNate Danielson: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 23rd percentileNate Danielson: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 43rd percentileNate Danielson: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 36th percentileA.J. Greer: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileA.J. Greer: Assists, 0.25 a game, 53rd percentileA.J. Greer: Points, 0.25 a game, 31st percentileA.J. Greer: Shots, 2.25 a game, 78th percentileA.J. Greer: Hits, 2.00 a game, 71st percentileA.J. Greer: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 46th percentileA.J. Greer: CF% rel, 2.5, 60th percentileA.J. Greer: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 42nd percentileA.J. Greer: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 41st percentileA.J. Greer: Chances created, 1.05 xG per 60, 71st percentileA.J. Greer: Shot quality, 8.8% a shot, 55th percentileA.J. Greer: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 18th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Nate Danielson 1A.J. Greer 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Danielson
A.J. Greer

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Danielson C, DET 2026-27 A.J. Greer L, ANA
5 Games played 4
0 Goals 0
1 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.20 Points per game 0.25
-1 Plus/minus -5
3 Shots 9
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
3 Hits 8
2 Penalty minutes 4
9:09 Average ice time 12:34
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.1 Corsi for % 50.0
-3.0 CF% relative to team +2.5
53.7 Fenwick for % 49.4
52.5 Expected goals for % 48.8
-5.9 xGF% relative to team -3.9
33.3 Goals for % 16.7
93.7 PDO 82.4
7 Shot attempts taken 12
Expected goals, all situations
0.4 Expected goals 0.9
0.52 Expected goals per 60 1.05
7.9% Chance per attempt 8.8%
-0.4 Goals above expected -0.9
Rating, in goals
-0.9 Goals above replacement +2.0
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.7 Even-strength offence +2.1
-0.6 Even-strength defence -0.3
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill -0.3
-0.3 Penalties -1.8
Contract
$909K Cap hit $4.25M
$909K Cap dollars per point $4.25M
-$23K Worth at the going rate $2.7M
-$932K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean