Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2025-26 season

At a glance

Nick Lardis Dominic James

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNick Lardis: Goals, 0.24 a game, 66th percentileNick Lardis: Assists, 0.12 a game, 18th percentileNick Lardis: Points, 0.37 a game, 39th percentileNick Lardis: Shots, 1.39 a game, 45th percentileNick Lardis: Hits, 1.39 a game, 66th percentileNick Lardis: Corsi for %, 46.0%, 15th percentileNick Lardis: CF% rel, 0.7, 55th percentileNick Lardis: On-ice xG %, 42.3%, 6th percentileNick Lardis: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 24th percentileNick Lardis: Chances created, 0.89 xG per 60, 64th percentileNick Lardis: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 43rd percentileNick Lardis: Finishing, +2.3 goals above expected, 77th percentileDominic James: Goals, 0.16 a game, 42nd percentileDominic James: Assists, 0.19 a game, 37th percentileDominic James: Points, 0.35 a game, 38th percentileDominic James: Shots, 1.30 a game, 40th percentileDominic James: Hits, 1.35 a game, 64th percentileDominic James: Corsi for %, 53.2%, 81st percentileDominic James: CF% rel, -1.5, 29th percentileDominic James: On-ice xG %, 52.2%, 69th percentileDominic James: Rating, +2.7 goals above replacement, 49th percentileDominic James: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 37th percentileDominic James: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 25th percentileDominic James: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 64th percentile
0510152040Nick Lardis 15Dominic James 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nick Lardis
Dominic James

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nick Lardis L, CHI 2025-26 Dominic James C, TBL
41 Games played 43
10 Goals 7
5 Assists 8
15 Points 15
0.37 Points per game 0.35
-18 Plus/minus 4
57 Shots 56
17.5 Shooting % 12.5
57 Hits 58
10 Penalty minutes 8
12:40 Average ice time 12:14
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.0 Corsi for % 53.2
+0.7 CF% relative to team -1.5
46.2 Fenwick for % 51.5
42.3 Expected goals for % 52.2
-0.4 xGF% relative to team -5.2
31.8 Goals for % 54.3
92.7 PDO 101.5
89 Shot attempts taken 103
Expected goals, all situations
7.7 Expected goals 6.5
0.89 Expected goals per 60 0.74
8.1% Chance per attempt 7.7%
+2.3 Goals above expected +0.5
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement +2.7
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.5
-0.4 Even-strength offence +0.1
-0.5 Even-strength defence +0.2
-0.6 Power play -0.5
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.2 Penalties +1.4
Contract
$897K Cap hit $910K
$60K Cap dollars per point $61K
$895K Worth at the going rate $3.1M
-$1K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean