Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

Matthew Wood A.J. Greer

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatthew Wood: Goals, 0.20 a game, 50th percentileMatthew Wood: Assists, 0.20 a game, 39th percentileMatthew Wood: Points, 0.40 a game, 41st percentileMatthew Wood: Shots, 1.80 a game, 61st percentileMatthew Wood: Hits, 1.40 a game, 56th percentileMatthew Wood: Corsi for %, 50.5%, 50th percentileMatthew Wood: CF% rel, 12.1, 95th percentileMatthew Wood: On-ice xG %, 46.5%, 36th percentileMatthew Wood: Rating, +0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileMatthew Wood: Chances created, 1.11 xG per 60, 75th percentileMatthew Wood: Shot quality, 9.2% a shot, 63rd percentileMatthew Wood: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 33rd percentileA.J. Greer: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileA.J. Greer: Assists, 0.25 a game, 53rd percentileA.J. Greer: Points, 0.25 a game, 31st percentileA.J. Greer: Shots, 2.25 a game, 78th percentileA.J. Greer: Hits, 2.00 a game, 71st percentileA.J. Greer: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 46th percentileA.J. Greer: CF% rel, 2.5, 60th percentileA.J. Greer: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 42nd percentileA.J. Greer: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 41st percentileA.J. Greer: Chances created, 1.05 xG per 60, 71st percentileA.J. Greer: Shot quality, 8.8% a shot, 55th percentileA.J. Greer: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 18th percentile
00.511.52Matthew Wood 2A.J. Greer 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matthew Wood
A.J. Greer

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matthew Wood R, NSH 2026-27 A.J. Greer L, ANA
5 Games played 4
1 Goals 0
1 Assists 1
2 Points 1
0.40 Points per game 0.25
0 Plus/minus -5
9 Shots 9
11.1 Shooting % 0.0
7 Hits 8
2 Penalty minutes 4
15:51 Average ice time 12:34
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.5 Corsi for % 50.0
+12.1 CF% relative to team +2.5
50.0 Fenwick for % 49.4
46.5 Expected goals for % 48.8
+8.8 xGF% relative to team -3.9
50.0 Goals for % 16.7
103.8 PDO 82.4
12 Shot attempts taken 12
Expected goals, all situations
1.5 Expected goals 0.9
1.11 Expected goals per 60 1.05
9.2% Chance per attempt 8.8%
-0.5 Goals above expected -0.9
Rating, in goals
+0.2 Goals above replacement +2.0
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.3
+0.2 Even-strength offence +2.1
-1.4 Even-strength defence -0.3
+0.5 Power play 0.0
-0.5 Penalty kill -0.3
0.0 Penalties -1.8
Contract
$950K Cap hit $4.25M
$475K Cap dollars per point $4.25M
$1M Worth at the going rate $2.7M
+$71K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean