Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Chris Pronger Mike Green

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Pronger: Goals, 0.08 a game, 72nd percentileChris Pronger: Assists, 0.42 a game, 90th percentileChris Pronger: Points, 0.50 a game, 86th percentileChris Pronger: Shots, 2.24 a game, 93rd percentileChris Pronger: Hits, 0.82 a game, 26th percentileChris Pronger: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 60th percentileChris Pronger: CF% rel, 0.7, 59th percentileChris Pronger: On-ice xG %, 50.3%, 54th percentileChris Pronger: Rating, +0.2 goals above replacement, 35th percentileChris Pronger: Chances created, 0.29 xG per 60, 87th percentileChris Pronger: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 67th percentileChris Pronger: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 24th percentileMike Green: Goals, 0.16 a game, 95th percentileMike Green: Assists, 0.33 a game, 79th percentileMike Green: Points, 0.49 a game, 85th percentileMike Green: Shots, 2.35 a game, 94th percentileMike Green: Hits, 2.04 a game, 86th percentileMike Green: Corsi for %, 52.8%, 83rd percentileMike Green: CF% rel, 2.7, 82nd percentileMike Green: On-ice xG %, 50.8%, 58th percentileMike Green: Rating, +3.9 goals above replacement, 73rd percentileMike Green: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 97th percentileMike Green: Shot quality, 4.7% a shot, 96th percentileMike Green: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 63rd percentile
05101520252040Chris Pronger 25Mike Green 24

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Pronger
Mike Green

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Pronger D, PHI 2010-11 Mike Green D, EDM
50 Games played 49
4 Goals 8
21 Assists 16
25 Points 24
0.50 Points per game 0.49
7 Plus/minus 6
112 Shots 115
3.6 Shooting % 7.0
41 Hits 100
44 Penalty minutes 48
22:30 Average ice time 25:12
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.7 Corsi for % 52.8
+0.7 CF% relative to team +2.7
52.3 Fenwick for % 51.8
50.3 Expected goals for % 50.8
-0.8 xGF% relative to team -0.4
56.5 Goals for % 50.0
101.1 PDO 99.4
138 Shot attempts taken 144
Expected goals, all situations
5.4 Expected goals 7.6
0.29 Expected goals per 60 0.37
3.6% Chance per attempt 4.7%
-1.4 Goals above expected +0.4
Rating, in goals
+0.2 Goals above replacement +3.9
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.6
-0.7 Even-strength offence +0.5
-0.5 Even-strength defence -0.9
+0.3 Power play +0.7
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
-2.6 Penalties -0.6
Contract
$4.936M Cap hit $5.25M
$197K Cap dollars per point $219K
$567K Worth at the going rate $2.1M
-$4.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean