Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Jason Arnott Chad LaRose

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJason Arnott: Goals, 0.23 a game, 66th percentileJason Arnott: Assists, 0.19 a game, 38th percentileJason Arnott: Points, 0.42 a game, 51st percentileJason Arnott: Shots, 2.32 a game, 73rd percentileJason Arnott: Hits, 0.58 a game, 21st percentileJason Arnott: Corsi for %, 53.5%, 80th percentileJason Arnott: CF% rel, 2.0, 64th percentileJason Arnott: On-ice xG %, 52.5%, 68th percentileJason Arnott: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 30th percentileJason Arnott: Chances created, 0.77 xG per 60, 54th percentileJason Arnott: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 22nd percentileJason Arnott: Finishing, +1.5 goals above expected, 66th percentileChad LaRose: Goals, 0.20 a game, 56th percentileChad LaRose: Assists, 0.18 a game, 35th percentileChad LaRose: Points, 0.38 a game, 43rd percentileChad LaRose: Shots, 2.15 a game, 67th percentileChad LaRose: Hits, 2.39 a game, 93rd percentileChad LaRose: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 56th percentileChad LaRose: CF% rel, 2.4, 68th percentileChad LaRose: On-ice xG %, 49.9%, 46th percentileChad LaRose: Rating, +3.9 goals above replacement, 56th percentileChad LaRose: Chances created, 0.81 xG per 60, 59th percentileChad LaRose: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 39th percentileChad LaRose: Finishing, -1.6 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
010203020406080Jason Arnott 31Chad LaRose 31

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Jason Arnott
Chad LaRose

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Jason Arnott C, STL 2010-11 Chad LaRose R, CAR
73 Games played 82
17 Goals 16
14 Assists 15
31 Points 31
0.42 Points per game 0.38
-6 Plus/minus -21
169 Shots 176
10.1 Shooting % 9.1
42 Hits 196
40 Penalty minutes 59
15:31 Average ice time 16:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.5 Corsi for % 50.7
+2.0 CF% relative to team +2.4
52.5 Fenwick for % 50.2
52.5 Expected goals for % 49.9
+1.5 xGF% relative to team +3.2
45.9 Goals for % 38.2
98.0 PDO 96.5
214 Shot attempts taken 291
Expected goals, all situations
14.5 Expected goals 17.6
0.77 Expected goals per 60 0.81
6.5% Chance per attempt 7.0%
+1.5 Goals above expected -1.6
Rating, in goals
+0.9 Goals above replacement +3.9
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.7
+0.0 Even-strength offence +0.1
+0.1 Even-strength defence +0.5
-0.5 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.7
-1.8 Penalties +0.5

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean