Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Scott Nichol Adam Cracknell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerScott Nichol: Goals, 0.07 a game, 16th percentileScott Nichol: Assists, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileScott Nichol: Points, 0.13 a game, 9th percentileScott Nichol: Shots, 1.09 a game, 17th percentileScott Nichol: Hits, 2.04 a game, 86th percentileScott Nichol: Corsi for %, 44.4%, 6th percentileScott Nichol: CF% rel, -10.1, 1st percentileScott Nichol: On-ice xG %, 45.7%, 16th percentileScott Nichol: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 14th percentileScott Nichol: Chances created, 0.46 xG per 60, 7th percentileScott Nichol: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 3rd percentileScott Nichol: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 47th percentileAdam Cracknell: Goals, 0.13 a game, 32nd percentileAdam Cracknell: Assists, 0.17 a game, 31st percentileAdam Cracknell: Points, 0.29 a game, 32nd percentileAdam Cracknell: Shots, 1.08 a game, 17th percentileAdam Cracknell: Hits, 1.21 a game, 54th percentileAdam Cracknell: Corsi for %, 48.5%, 34th percentileAdam Cracknell: CF% rel, -2.6, 26th percentileAdam Cracknell: On-ice xG %, 39.2%, 3rd percentileAdam Cracknell: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 20th percentileAdam Cracknell: Chances created, 0.51 xG per 60, 12th percentileAdam Cracknell: Shot quality, 4.8% a shot, 1st percentileAdam Cracknell: Finishing, +1.2 goals above expected, 62nd percentile
02462040Scott Nichol 7Adam Cracknell 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Scott Nichol
Adam Cracknell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Scott Nichol C, STL 2010-11 Adam Cracknell R, ANA
56 Games played 24
4 Goals 3
3 Assists 4
7 Points 7
0.13 Points per game 0.29
-3 Plus/minus 1
61 Shots 26
6.6 Shooting % 11.5
114 Hits 29
50 Penalty minutes 8
9:45 Average ice time 8:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.4 Corsi for % 48.5
-10.1 CF% relative to team -2.6
44.9 Fenwick for % 47.8
45.7 Expected goals for % 39.2
-11.2 xGF% relative to team -12.2
44.8 Goals for % 52.6
99.7 PDO 101.3
80 Shot attempts taken 44
Expected goals, all situations
4.2 Expected goals 1.8
0.46 Expected goals per 60 0.51
5.6% Chance per attempt 4.8%
-0.2 Goals above expected +1.2
Rating, in goals
-0.8 Goals above replacement -0.1
-0.1 Wins above replacement 0.0
-3.0 Even-strength offence -0.4
+0.7 Even-strength defence 0.0
+0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.2 Penalties -0.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean