Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Tim Thomas Corey Crawford

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerTim Thomas: Save %, 0.938, 98th percentileTim Thomas: Goals against, 1.96 a game, 98th percentileTim Thomas: Workload, 31.8 shots a game, 96th percentileTim Thomas: Games, 57 games, 67th percentileTim Thomas: Goals saved, +0.67 above expected per 60, 94th percentileCorey Crawford: Save %, 0.917, 65th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals against, 2.25 a game, 74th percentileCorey Crawford: Workload, 27.1 shots a game, 39th percentileCorey Crawford: Games, 57 games, 67th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals saved, +0.11 above expected per 60, 66th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Tim Thomas G, DAL 2010-11 Corey Crawford G, CHI
57 Games played 57
35 Wins 33
11 Losses 18
9 Shutouts 4
1,811 Shots against 1,545
1,699 Saves 1,417
112 Goals against 128
0.938 Save % 0.917
2.00 Goals against average 2.30
Expected goals, while he was in net
149.5 Expected goals against 134.3
+37.5 Goals saved above expected +6.3
+0.67 Saved above expected per 60 +0.11
6.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+52.7 Goals above replacement +20.0
+8.8 Wins above replacement +3.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean