Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

John Erskine Matt Greene

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn Erskine: Goals, 0.05 a game, 56th percentileJohn Erskine: Assists, 0.10 a game, 16th percentileJohn Erskine: Points, 0.15 a game, 23rd percentileJohn Erskine: Shots, 0.79 a game, 22nd percentileJohn Erskine: Hits, 2.27 a game, 89th percentileJohn Erskine: Corsi for %, 50.1%, 52nd percentileJohn Erskine: CF% rel, -1.9, 33rd percentileJohn Erskine: On-ice xG %, 55.4%, 92nd percentileJohn Erskine: Rating, +4.4 goals above replacement, 77th percentileJohn Erskine: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 16th percentileJohn Erskine: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 11th percentileJohn Erskine: Finishing, +2.3 goals above expected, 90th percentileMatt Greene: Goals, 0.03 a game, 32nd percentileMatt Greene: Assists, 0.13 a game, 24th percentileMatt Greene: Points, 0.15 a game, 24th percentileMatt Greene: Shots, 0.70 a game, 15th percentileMatt Greene: Hits, 3.42 a game, 99th percentileMatt Greene: Corsi for %, 52.2%, 78th percentileMatt Greene: CF% rel, 1.0, 63rd percentileMatt Greene: On-ice xG %, 52.8%, 78th percentileMatt Greene: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 47th percentileMatt Greene: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 8th percentileMatt Greene: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 2nd percentileMatt Greene: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 64th percentile
0510204060John Erskine 11Matt Greene 11

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John Erskine
Matt Greene

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John Erskine D, WSH 2010-11 Matt Greene D, LAK
73 Games played 71
4 Goals 2
7 Assists 9
11 Points 11
0.15 Points per game 0.15
1 Plus/minus 3
58 Shots 50
6.9 Shooting % 4.0
166 Hits 243
94 Penalty minutes 70
14:50 Average ice time 16:59
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.1 Corsi for % 52.2
-1.9 CF% relative to team +1.0
51.0 Fenwick for % 52.2
55.4 Expected goals for % 52.8
+4.3 xGF% relative to team +0.9
50.0 Goals for % 52.5
99.4 PDO 100.1
116 Shot attempts taken 109
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 1.6
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.08
2.2% Chance per attempt 2.0%
+2.3 Goals above expected +0.4
Rating, in goals
+4.4 Goals above replacement +1.0
+0.7 Wins above replacement +0.2
-1.2 Even-strength offence -2.0
+3.4 Even-strength defence +2.3
-0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.3 Penalty kill -0.2
-1.7 Penalties -3.0

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean