Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Matt Walker Alex Plante

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Walker: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMatt Walker: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMatt Walker: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMatt Walker: Shots, 0.75 a game, 19th percentileMatt Walker: Hits, 1.25 a game, 51st percentileMatt Walker: Corsi for %, 35.4%, 1st percentileMatt Walker: CF% rel, -16.0, 1st percentileMatt Walker: On-ice xG %, 29.0%, 1st percentileMatt Walker: Rating, -0.6 goals above replacement, 28th percentileMatt Walker: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 68th percentileMatt Walker: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 99th percentileMatt Walker: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 52nd percentileAlex Plante: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAlex Plante: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAlex Plante: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAlex Plante: Shots, 1.67 a game, 81st percentileAlex Plante: Hits, 1.33 a game, 55th percentileAlex Plante: Corsi for %, 55.4%, 98th percentileAlex Plante: CF% rel, 7.5, 99th percentileAlex Plante: On-ice xG %, 35.4%, 1st percentileAlex Plante: Rating, -0.6 goals above replacement, 28th percentileAlex Plante: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 15th percentileAlex Plante: Shot quality, 1.3% a shot, 1st percentileAlex Plante: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Matt Walker 0Alex Plante 0

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Walker
Alex Plante

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Walker D, PHI 2010-11 Alex Plante D, EDM
4 Games played 3
0 Goals 0
0 Assists 0
0 Points 0
0.00 Points per game 0.00
0 Plus/minus -2
3 Shots 5
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
5 Hits 4
4 Penalty minutes 11
11:38 Average ice time 15:03
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
35.4 Corsi for % 55.4
-16.0 CF% relative to team +7.5
39.7 Fenwick for % 52.4
29.0 Expected goals for % 35.4
-30.5 xGF% relative to team -14.5
50.0 Goals for % 25.0
102.5 PDO 88.8
4 Shot attempts taken 6
Expected goals, all situations
0.2 Expected goals 0.1
0.22 Expected goals per 60 0.09
5.6% Chance per attempt 1.3%
-0.2 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
-0.6 Goals above replacement -0.6
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.7 Even-strength offence -0.4
0.0 Even-strength defence -0.2
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.0 Penalties -0.2

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean