Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Chris Neil Chris Conner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Neil: Goals, 0.08 a game, 18th percentileChris Neil: Assists, 0.13 a game, 21st percentileChris Neil: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileChris Neil: Shots, 1.31 a game, 28th percentileChris Neil: Hits, 3.23 a game, 98th percentileChris Neil: Corsi for %, 50.4%, 53rd percentileChris Neil: CF% rel, 0.4, 50th percentileChris Neil: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 31st percentileChris Neil: Rating, -1.5 goals above replacement, 9th percentileChris Neil: Chances created, 0.67 xG per 60, 37th percentileChris Neil: Shot quality, 8.0% a shot, 71st percentileChris Neil: Finishing, -6.3 goals above expected, 4th percentileChris Conner: Goals, 0.12 a game, 31st percentileChris Conner: Assists, 0.15 a game, 28th percentileChris Conner: Points, 0.27 a game, 28th percentileChris Conner: Shots, 1.52 a game, 40th percentileChris Conner: Hits, 0.83 a game, 36th percentileChris Conner: Corsi for %, 54.0%, 84th percentileChris Conner: CF% rel, 2.3, 66th percentileChris Conner: On-ice xG %, 55.2%, 86th percentileChris Conner: Rating, +3.7 goals above replacement, 54th percentileChris Conner: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 41st percentileChris Conner: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 27th percentileChris Conner: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 39th percentile
05101520406080Chris Neil 16Chris Conner 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Neil
Chris Conner

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Neil R, OTT 2010-11 Chris Conner R, WSH
80 Games played 60
6 Goals 7
10 Assists 9
16 Points 16
0.20 Points per game 0.27
-14 Plus/minus 5
105 Shots 91
5.7 Shooting % 7.7
258 Hits 50
210 Penalty minutes 10
12:46 Average ice time 11:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.4 Corsi for % 54.0
+0.4 CF% relative to team +2.3
50.2 Fenwick for % 53.5
48.1 Expected goals for % 55.2
-1.8 xGF% relative to team +5.5
39.4 Goals for % 58.5
96.5 PDO 101.1
183 Shot attempts taken 147
Expected goals, all situations
11.3 Expected goals 8.1
0.67 Expected goals per 60 0.68
8.0% Chance per attempt 6.6%
-6.3 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
-1.5 Goals above replacement +3.7
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.6
-3.3 Even-strength offence -0.3
+0.7 Even-strength defence +2.0
-0.5 Power play -0.6
0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
-1.2 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$2M Cap hit $550K
$125K Cap dollars per point $34K
-$124K Worth at the going rate $2.1M
-$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean