Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Tim Connolly Sam Gagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTim Connolly: Goals, 0.19 a game, 55th percentileTim Connolly: Assists, 0.43 a game, 84th percentileTim Connolly: Points, 0.62 a game, 73rd percentileTim Connolly: Shots, 2.22 a game, 70th percentileTim Connolly: Hits, 0.35 a game, 8th percentileTim Connolly: Corsi for %, 53.7%, 81st percentileTim Connolly: CF% rel, 4.4, 87th percentileTim Connolly: On-ice xG %, 52.6%, 69th percentileTim Connolly: Rating, +5.6 goals above replacement, 67th percentileTim Connolly: Chances created, 0.63 xG per 60, 33rd percentileTim Connolly: Shot quality, 6.1% a shot, 12th percentileTim Connolly: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 59th percentileSam Gagner: Goals, 0.22 a game, 63rd percentileSam Gagner: Assists, 0.40 a game, 80th percentileSam Gagner: Points, 0.62 a game, 73rd percentileSam Gagner: Shots, 2.03 a game, 62nd percentileSam Gagner: Hits, 0.35 a game, 8th percentileSam Gagner: Corsi for %, 48.0%, 27th percentileSam Gagner: CF% rel, 3.1, 75th percentileSam Gagner: On-ice xG %, 45.6%, 15th percentileSam Gagner: Rating, +4.1 goals above replacement, 58th percentileSam Gagner: Chances created, 0.75 xG per 60, 52nd percentileSam Gagner: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 66th percentileSam Gagner: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 39th percentile
010203040204060Tim Connolly 42Sam Gagner 42

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tim Connolly
Sam Gagner

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tim Connolly C, TOR 2010-11 Sam Gagner C, EDM
68 Games played 68
13 Goals 15
29 Assists 27
42 Points 42
0.62 Points per game 0.62
-10 Plus/minus -17
151 Shots 138
8.6 Shooting % 10.9
24 Hits 24
20 Penalty minutes 37
16:55 Average ice time 17:45
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.7 Corsi for % 48.0
+4.4 CF% relative to team +3.1
52.4 Fenwick for % 47.3
52.6 Expected goals for % 45.6
+2.4 xGF% relative to team +2.1
49.3 Goals for % 42.9
98.9 PDO 97.8
192 Shot attempts taken 180
Expected goals, all situations
12.1 Expected goals 15.0
0.63 Expected goals per 60 0.75
6.1% Chance per attempt 7.9%
+0.9 Goals above expected -1.0
Rating, in goals
+5.6 Goals above replacement +4.1
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.7
+0.9 Even-strength offence +1.9
+0.5 Even-strength defence -1.4
+0.5 Power play -0.4
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.3
+0.5 Penalties +0.8

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean