Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Andreas Lilja Matt Carkner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAndreas Lilja: Goals, 0.02 a game, 20th percentileAndreas Lilja: Assists, 0.12 a game, 20th percentileAndreas Lilja: Points, 0.13 a game, 18th percentileAndreas Lilja: Shots, 0.60 a game, 8th percentileAndreas Lilja: Hits, 1.77 a game, 75th percentileAndreas Lilja: Corsi for %, 40.3%, 1st percentileAndreas Lilja: CF% rel, -5.5, 6th percentileAndreas Lilja: On-ice xG %, 37.2%, 1st percentileAndreas Lilja: Rating, -3.5 goals above replacement, 4th percentileAndreas Lilja: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 10th percentileAndreas Lilja: Shot quality, 2.8% a shot, 33rd percentileAndreas Lilja: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 51st percentileMatt Carkner: Goals, 0.02 a game, 21st percentileMatt Carkner: Assists, 0.12 a game, 21st percentileMatt Carkner: Points, 0.14 a game, 20th percentileMatt Carkner: Shots, 0.80 a game, 23rd percentileMatt Carkner: Hits, 1.42 a game, 61st percentileMatt Carkner: Corsi for %, 52.5%, 80th percentileMatt Carkner: CF% rel, 3.5, 88th percentileMatt Carkner: On-ice xG %, 56.6%, 94th percentileMatt Carkner: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 55th percentileMatt Carkner: Chances created, 0.08 xG per 60, 5th percentileMatt Carkner: Shot quality, 1.9% a shot, 1st percentileMatt Carkner: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 59th percentile
02462040Andreas Lilja 7Matt Carkner 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Andreas Lilja
Matt Carkner

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Andreas Lilja D, PHI 2010-11 Matt Carkner D, NYI
52 Games played 50
1 Goals 1
6 Assists 6
7 Points 7
0.13 Points per game 0.14
-15 Plus/minus 0
31 Shots 40
3.2 Shooting % 2.5
92 Hits 71
28 Penalty minutes 136
17:26 Average ice time 14:53
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.3 Corsi for % 52.5
-5.5 CF% relative to team +3.5
41.6 Fenwick for % 53.3
37.2 Expected goals for % 56.6
-9.3 xGF% relative to team +10.0
31.1 Goals for % 50.0
97.1 PDO 99.1
56 Shot attempts taken 69
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 0.9
0.08 Expected goals per 60 0.08
2.8% Chance per attempt 1.9%
-0.2 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
-3.5 Goals above replacement +1.8
-0.6 Wins above replacement +0.3
-3.5 Even-strength offence +0.3
-1.1 Even-strength defence +1.7
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.2 Penalty kill -0.2
-1.7 Penalties -2.6

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean