Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Dan Ellis Craig Anderson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerDan Ellis: Save %, 0.898, 19th percentileDan Ellis: Goals against, 2.52 a game, 39th percentileDan Ellis: Workload, 24.8 shots a game, 11th percentileDan Ellis: Games, 44 games, 44th percentileDan Ellis: Goals saved, -0.44 above expected per 60, 15th percentileCraig Anderson: Save %, 0.913, 43rd percentileCraig Anderson: Goals against, 2.65 a game, 22nd percentileCraig Anderson: Workload, 30.3 shots a game, 83rd percentileCraig Anderson: Games, 51 games, 54th percentileCraig Anderson: Goals saved, -0.10 above expected per 60, 43rd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Dan Ellis G, FLA 2010-11 Craig Anderson G, BUF
44 Games played 51
21 Wins 24
10 Losses 20
2 Shutouts 2
1,089 Shots against 1,546
978 Saves 1,411
111 Goals against 135
0.898 Save % 0.913
2.77 Goals against average 2.83
Expected goals, while he was in net
93.4 Expected goals against 130.4
-17.6 Goals saved above expected -4.6
-0.44 Saved above expected per 60 -0.10
6.0% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
-8.1 Goals above replacement +8.7
-1.3 Wins above replacement +1.4
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $1.813M
-$413K Worth at the going rate $1.6M
-$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit -$258K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean