Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Dan Ellis Peter Budaj

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerDan Ellis: Save %, 0.898, 19th percentileDan Ellis: Goals against, 2.52 a game, 39th percentileDan Ellis: Workload, 24.8 shots a game, 11th percentileDan Ellis: Games, 44 games, 44th percentileDan Ellis: Goals saved, -0.44 above expected per 60, 15th percentilePeter Budaj: Save %, 0.895, 11th percentilePeter Budaj: Goals against, 2.89 a game, 7th percentilePeter Budaj: Workload, 27.4 shots a game, 43rd percentilePeter Budaj: Games, 45 games, 46th percentilePeter Budaj: Goals saved, -0.45 above expected per 60, 13th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Dan Ellis G, FLA 2010-11 Peter Budaj G, LAK
44 Games played 45
21 Wins 15
10 Losses 21
2 Shutouts 1
1,089 Shots against 1,234
978 Saves 1,104
111 Goals against 130
0.898 Save % 0.895
2.77 Goals against average 3.20
Expected goals, while he was in net
93.4 Expected goals against 111.5
-17.6 Goals saved above expected -18.5
-0.44 Saved above expected per 60 -0.45
6.0% Chance per attempt faced 6.3%
Rating, in goals
-8.1 Goals above replacement -7.1
-1.3 Wins above replacement -1.2
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $1.25M
-$413K Worth at the going rate -$301K
-$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean