Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Jason Williams Andrew Ebbett

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJason Williams: Goals, 0.07 a game, 17th percentileJason Williams: Assists, 0.11 a game, 19th percentileJason Williams: Points, 0.19 a game, 17th percentileJason Williams: Shots, 0.67 a game, 6th percentileJason Williams: Hits, 0.52 a game, 17th percentileJason Williams: Corsi for %, 48.9%, 38th percentileJason Williams: CF% rel, -1.2, 34th percentileJason Williams: On-ice xG %, 42.1%, 6th percentileJason Williams: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileJason Williams: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 6th percentileJason Williams: Shot quality, 5.2% a shot, 2nd percentileJason Williams: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 54th percentileAndrew Ebbett: Goals, 0.06 a game, 13th percentileAndrew Ebbett: Assists, 0.09 a game, 14th percentileAndrew Ebbett: Points, 0.15 a game, 12th percentileAndrew Ebbett: Shots, 0.70 a game, 7th percentileAndrew Ebbett: Hits, 0.39 a game, 10th percentileAndrew Ebbett: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 48th percentileAndrew Ebbett: CF% rel, -0.3, 42nd percentileAndrew Ebbett: On-ice xG %, 47.1%, 23rd percentileAndrew Ebbett: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileAndrew Ebbett: Chances created, 0.49 xG per 60, 10th percentileAndrew Ebbett: Shot quality, 8.4% a shot, 81st percentileAndrew Ebbett: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 42nd percentile
01234520Jason Williams 5Andrew Ebbett 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Jason Williams
Andrew Ebbett

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Jason Williams C, PIT 2010-11 Andrew Ebbett C, PIT
27 Games played 33
2 Goals 2
3 Assists 3
5 Points 5
0.19 Points per game 0.15
-2 Plus/minus -1
18 Shots 23
11.1 Shooting % 8.7
14 Hits 13
6 Penalty minutes 4
8:07 Average ice time 10:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.9 Corsi for % 49.8
-1.2 CF% relative to team -0.3
46.7 Fenwick for % 48.4
42.1 Expected goals for % 47.1
-4.7 xGF% relative to team +0.2
41.7 Goals for % 43.8
99.4 PDO 98.7
42 Shot attempts taken 40
Expected goals, all situations
1.6 Expected goals 2.7
0.44 Expected goals per 60 0.49
5.2% Chance per attempt 8.4%
+0.4 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
+0.0 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.6 Even-strength offence -1.1
+0.4 Even-strength defence +0.1
+0.1 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.5 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean