Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Dan Hamhuis Kevin Bieksa

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDan Hamhuis: Goals, 0.09 a game, 79th percentileDan Hamhuis: Assists, 0.27 a game, 68th percentileDan Hamhuis: Points, 0.36 a game, 71st percentileDan Hamhuis: Shots, 1.70 a game, 82nd percentileDan Hamhuis: Hits, 1.19 a game, 49th percentileDan Hamhuis: Corsi for %, 54.8%, 95th percentileDan Hamhuis: CF% rel, 4.1, 92nd percentileDan Hamhuis: On-ice xG %, 50.7%, 56th percentileDan Hamhuis: Rating, +3.6 goals above replacement, 70th percentileDan Hamhuis: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 57th percentileDan Hamhuis: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 44th percentileDan Hamhuis: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 65th percentileKevin Bieksa: Goals, 0.09 a game, 77th percentileKevin Bieksa: Assists, 0.24 a game, 63rd percentileKevin Bieksa: Points, 0.33 a game, 67th percentileKevin Bieksa: Shots, 1.59 a game, 75th percentileKevin Bieksa: Hits, 1.58 a game, 69th percentileKevin Bieksa: Corsi for %, 52.6%, 81st percentileKevin Bieksa: CF% rel, 1.2, 65th percentileKevin Bieksa: On-ice xG %, 49.9%, 49th percentileKevin Bieksa: Rating, +2.3 goals above replacement, 59th percentileKevin Bieksa: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 68th percentileKevin Bieksa: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 62nd percentileKevin Bieksa: Finishing, +0.6 goals above expected, 67th percentile
05101520204060Dan Hamhuis 23Kevin Bieksa 22

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Dan Hamhuis
Kevin Bieksa

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Dan Hamhuis D, NSH 2010-11 Kevin Bieksa D, ANA
64 Games played 66
6 Goals 6
17 Assists 16
23 Points 22
0.36 Points per game 0.33
29 Plus/minus 32
109 Shots 105
5.5 Shooting % 5.7
76 Hits 104
34 Penalty minutes 73
22:41 Average ice time 22:28
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.8 Corsi for % 52.6
+4.1 CF% relative to team +1.2
54.3 Fenwick for % 52.7
50.7 Expected goals for % 49.9
+1.5 xGF% relative to team -0.5
60.7 Goals for % 62.4
101.7 PDO 103.0
184 Shot attempts taken 164
Expected goals, all situations
4.5 Expected goals 5.4
0.19 Expected goals per 60 0.22
3.1% Chance per attempt 3.5%
+0.5 Goals above expected +0.6
Rating, in goals
+3.6 Goals above replacement +2.3
+0.6 Wins above replacement +0.4
+0.7 Even-strength offence -0.8
-1.9 Even-strength defence +0.6
-0.1 Power play -0.7
+0.5 Penalty kill -0.5
-0.4 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$4.5M Cap hit $3.75M
$196K Cap dollars per point $170K
$2M Worth at the going rate $1.5M
-$2.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean