Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Ales Hemsky Sam Gagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAles Hemsky: Goals, 0.30 a game, 82nd percentileAles Hemsky: Assists, 0.60 a game, 95th percentileAles Hemsky: Points, 0.89 a game, 95th percentileAles Hemsky: Shots, 2.13 a game, 66th percentileAles Hemsky: Hits, 0.62 a game, 22nd percentileAles Hemsky: Corsi for %, 46.7%, 18th percentileAles Hemsky: CF% rel, 1.6, 61st percentileAles Hemsky: On-ice xG %, 44.8%, 12th percentileAles Hemsky: Rating, +4.1 goals above replacement, 58th percentileAles Hemsky: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 41st percentileAles Hemsky: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 48th percentileAles Hemsky: Finishing, +2.2 goals above expected, 73rd percentileSam Gagner: Goals, 0.22 a game, 63rd percentileSam Gagner: Assists, 0.40 a game, 80th percentileSam Gagner: Points, 0.62 a game, 73rd percentileSam Gagner: Shots, 2.03 a game, 62nd percentileSam Gagner: Hits, 0.35 a game, 8th percentileSam Gagner: Corsi for %, 48.0%, 27th percentileSam Gagner: CF% rel, 3.1, 75th percentileSam Gagner: On-ice xG %, 45.6%, 15th percentileSam Gagner: Rating, +4.1 goals above replacement, 58th percentileSam Gagner: Chances created, 0.75 xG per 60, 52nd percentileSam Gagner: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 66th percentileSam Gagner: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 39th percentile
010203040204060Ales Hemsky 42Sam Gagner 42

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Ales Hemsky
Sam Gagner

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Ales Hemsky R, MTL 2010-11 Sam Gagner C, EDM
47 Games played 68
14 Goals 15
28 Assists 27
42 Points 42
0.89 Points per game 0.62
3 Plus/minus -17
100 Shots 138
14.0 Shooting % 10.9
29 Hits 24
18 Penalty minutes 37
18:17 Average ice time 17:45
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.7 Corsi for % 48.0
+1.6 CF% relative to team +3.1
46.0 Fenwick for % 47.3
44.8 Expected goals for % 45.6
+3.2 xGF% relative to team +2.1
49.2 Goals for % 42.9
101.1 PDO 97.8
129 Shot attempts taken 180
Expected goals, all situations
9.8 Expected goals 15.0
0.68 Expected goals per 60 0.75
7.3% Chance per attempt 7.9%
+2.2 Goals above expected -1.0
Rating, in goals
+4.1 Goals above replacement +4.1
+0.7 Wins above replacement +0.7
+3.2 Even-strength offence +1.9
-1.8 Even-strength defence -1.4
-0.1 Power play -0.4
-0.4 Penalty kill -0.3
+0.9 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$4.1M Cap hit $2.275M
$98K Cap dollars per point $54K
$2.2M Worth at the going rate $2.2M
-$1.9M Value: worth minus cap hit -$49K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean