Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Peter Budaj Dan Ellis

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerPeter Budaj: Save %, 0.895, 11th percentilePeter Budaj: Goals against, 2.89 a game, 7th percentilePeter Budaj: Workload, 27.4 shots a game, 43rd percentilePeter Budaj: Games, 45 games, 46th percentilePeter Budaj: Goals saved, -0.45 above expected per 60, 13th percentileDan Ellis: Save %, 0.898, 19th percentileDan Ellis: Goals against, 2.52 a game, 39th percentileDan Ellis: Workload, 24.8 shots a game, 11th percentileDan Ellis: Games, 44 games, 44th percentileDan Ellis: Goals saved, -0.44 above expected per 60, 15th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Peter Budaj G, LAK 2010-11 Dan Ellis G, FLA
45 Games played 44
15 Wins 21
21 Losses 10
1 Shutouts 2
1,234 Shots against 1,089
1,104 Saves 978
130 Goals against 111
0.895 Save % 0.898
3.20 Goals against average 2.77
Expected goals, while he was in net
111.5 Expected goals against 93.4
-18.5 Goals saved above expected -17.6
-0.45 Saved above expected per 60 -0.44
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 6.0%
Rating, in goals
-7.1 Goals above replacement -8.1
-1.2 Wins above replacement -1.3
Contract
$1.25M Cap hit $1.5M
-$301K Worth at the going rate -$413K
-$1.6M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean