Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Patrick Sharp Joe Thornton

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPatrick Sharp: Goals, 0.46 a game, 98th percentilePatrick Sharp: Assists, 0.50 a game, 90th percentilePatrick Sharp: Points, 0.96 a game, 96th percentilePatrick Sharp: Shots, 3.62 a game, 97th percentilePatrick Sharp: Hits, 1.03 a game, 47th percentilePatrick Sharp: Corsi for %, 54.1%, 85th percentilePatrick Sharp: CF% rel, 2.4, 68th percentilePatrick Sharp: On-ice xG %, 50.7%, 52nd percentilePatrick Sharp: Rating, +7.7 goals above replacement, 79th percentilePatrick Sharp: Chances created, 0.99 xG per 60, 86th percentilePatrick Sharp: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 22nd percentilePatrick Sharp: Finishing, +8.2 goals above expected, 97th percentileJoe Thornton: Goals, 0.26 a game, 74th percentileJoe Thornton: Assists, 0.61 a game, 96th percentileJoe Thornton: Points, 0.88 a game, 93rd percentileJoe Thornton: Shots, 1.86 a game, 56th percentileJoe Thornton: Hits, 0.70 a game, 28th percentileJoe Thornton: Corsi for %, 53.8%, 82nd percentileJoe Thornton: CF% rel, 0.4, 50th percentileJoe Thornton: On-ice xG %, 54.9%, 85th percentileJoe Thornton: Rating, +13.7 goals above replacement, 96th percentileJoe Thornton: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 31st percentileJoe Thornton: Shot quality, 8.4% a shot, 80th percentileJoe Thornton: Finishing, +1.6 goals above expected, 67th percentile
020406020406080Patrick Sharp 71Joe Thornton 70

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Patrick Sharp
Joe Thornton

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Patrick Sharp L, CHI 2010-11 Joe Thornton C, FLA
74 Games played 80
34 Goals 21
37 Assists 49
71 Points 70
0.96 Points per game 0.88
-1 Plus/minus 4
268 Shots 149
12.7 Shooting % 14.1
76 Hits 56
38 Penalty minutes 47
19:25 Average ice time 19:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.1 Corsi for % 53.8
+2.4 CF% relative to team +0.4
54.3 Fenwick for % 53.4
50.7 Expected goals for % 54.9
-1.7 xGF% relative to team -2.2
51.1 Goals for % 55.6
98.8 PDO 101.4
305 Shot attempts taken 159
Expected goals, all situations
23.8 Expected goals 16.4
0.99 Expected goals per 60 0.62
6.5% Chance per attempt 8.4%
+8.2 Goals above expected +1.6
Rating, in goals
+7.7 Goals above replacement +13.7
+1.3 Wins above replacement +2.3
+4.3 Even-strength offence +1.0
-1.1 Even-strength defence +3.1
+1.4 Power play +4.1
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.8 Penalties +0.9
Contract
$3.9M Cap hit $7.2M
$55K Cap dollars per point $103K
$3.8M Worth at the going rate $6.3M
-$147K Value: worth minus cap hit -$928K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean