Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Ray Emery Justin Peters

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerRay Emery: Save %, 0.926, 93rd percentileRay Emery: Goals against, 2.00 a game, 96th percentileRay Emery: Workload, 27.2 shots a game, 41st percentileRay Emery: Games, 10 games, 1st percentileRay Emery: Goals saved, +0.24 above expected per 60, 75th percentileJustin Peters: Save %, 0.875, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Goals against, 3.58 a game, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Workload, 28.6 shots a game, 56th percentileJustin Peters: Games, 12 games, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Goals saved, -0.92 above expected per 60, 2nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Ray Emery G, PHI 2010-11 Justin Peters G, ARI
10 Games played 12
7 Wins 3
2 Losses 5
0 Shutouts 0
272 Shots against 343
252 Saves 300
20 Goals against 43
0.926 Save % 0.875
2.28 Goals against average 3.98
Expected goals, while he was in net
22.1 Expected goals against 33.1
+2.1 Goals saved above expected -9.9
+0.24 Saved above expected per 60 -0.92
5.4% Chance per attempt faced 7.0%
Rating, in goals
+4.4 Goals above replacement -6.5
+0.7 Wins above replacement -1.1
Contract
$500K Cap hit $525K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean