Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Richard Petiot Brendon Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRichard Petiot: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileRichard Petiot: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileRichard Petiot: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileRichard Petiot: Shots, 0.50 a game, 4th percentileRichard Petiot: Hits, 1.50 a game, 64th percentileRichard Petiot: Corsi for %, 37.5%, 1st percentileRichard Petiot: CF% rel, -7.0, 1st percentileRichard Petiot: On-ice xG %, 40.6%, 2nd percentileRichard Petiot: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 35th percentileRichard Petiot: Chances created, 0.02 xG per 60, 1st percentileRichard Petiot: Shot quality, 0.7% a shot, 1st percentileRichard Petiot: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 55th percentileBrendon Nash: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrendon Nash: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrendon Nash: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrendon Nash: Shots, 1.00 a game, 39th percentileBrendon Nash: Hits, 0.50 a game, 7th percentileBrendon Nash: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 51st percentileBrendon Nash: CF% rel, -5.7, 4th percentileBrendon Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.1%, 73rd percentileBrendon Nash: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 35th percentileBrendon Nash: Chances created, 0.12 xG per 60, 23rd percentileBrendon Nash: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 3rd percentileBrendon Nash: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 54th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Richard Petiot 0Brendon Nash 0

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Richard Petiot
Brendon Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Richard Petiot D, EDM 2010-11 Brendon Nash D, MTL
2 Games played 2
0 Goals 0
0 Assists 0
0 Points 0
0.00 Points per game 0.00
1 Plus/minus -1
1 Shots 2
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
3 Hits 1
2 Penalty minutes 0
13:05 Average ice time 10:12
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
37.5 Corsi for % 50.0
-7.0 CF% relative to team -5.7
41.4 Fenwick for % 52.9
40.6 Expected goals for % 52.1
-11.0 xGF% relative to team -6.4
100.0 Goals for % 0.0
111.1 PDO 85.7
2 Shot attempts taken 4
Expected goals, all situations
0.0 Expected goals 0.0
0.02 Expected goals per 60 0.12
0.7% Chance per attempt 2.0%
0.0 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.2 Even-strength offence -0.3
+0.2 Even-strength defence +0.3
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.0 Penalties +0.0

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean