Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Mike Smith Al Montoya

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Smith: Save %, 0.899, 20th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.64 a game, 26th percentileMike Smith: Workload, 26.2 shots a game, 19th percentileMike Smith: Games, 22 games, 4th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, -0.63 above expected per 60, 4th percentileAl Montoya: Save %, 0.921, 78th percentileAl Montoya: Goals against, 2.30 a game, 65th percentileAl Montoya: Workload, 29.3 shots a game, 63rd percentileAl Montoya: Games, 20 games, 2nd percentileAl Montoya: Goals saved, +0.77 above expected per 60, 96th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Smith G, EDM 2010-11 Al Montoya G, EDM
22 Games played 20
13 Wins 9
6 Losses 5
1 Shutouts 1
576 Shots against 585
518 Saves 539
58 Goals against 46
0.899 Save % 0.921
2.89 Goals against average 2.39
Expected goals, while he was in net
45.4 Expected goals against 60.8
-12.6 Goals saved above expected +14.8
-0.63 Saved above expected per 60 +0.77
5.7% Chance per attempt faced 7.2%
Rating, in goals
-7.9 Goals above replacement +21.0
-1.3 Wins above replacement +3.5
Contract
$2.2M Cap hit $750K
-$398K Worth at the going rate $3M
-$2.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean