Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

David Moss Jordan Staal

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDavid Moss: Goals, 0.29 a game, 82nd percentileDavid Moss: Assists, 0.22 a game, 47th percentileDavid Moss: Points, 0.52 a game, 62nd percentileDavid Moss: Shots, 2.19 a game, 68th percentileDavid Moss: Hits, 1.59 a game, 74th percentileDavid Moss: Corsi for %, 54.2%, 86th percentileDavid Moss: CF% rel, 3.8, 81st percentileDavid Moss: On-ice xG %, 57.9%, 96th percentileDavid Moss: Rating, +8.1 goals above replacement, 81st percentileDavid Moss: Chances created, 0.95 xG per 60, 81st percentileDavid Moss: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 50th percentileDavid Moss: Finishing, +4.5 goals above expected, 86th percentileJordan Staal: Goals, 0.26 a game, 73rd percentileJordan Staal: Assists, 0.45 a game, 87th percentileJordan Staal: Points, 0.71 a game, 83rd percentileJordan Staal: Shots, 2.17 a game, 68th percentileJordan Staal: Hits, 1.67 a game, 77th percentileJordan Staal: Corsi for %, 53.2%, 77th percentileJordan Staal: CF% rel, 0.0, 44th percentileJordan Staal: On-ice xG %, 47.9%, 30th percentileJordan Staal: Rating, +1.4 goals above replacement, 34th percentileJordan Staal: Chances created, 0.73 xG per 60, 48th percentileJordan Staal: Shot quality, 9.2% a shot, 93rd percentileJordan Staal: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 51st percentile
01020302040David Moss 30Jordan Staal 30

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

David Moss
Jordan Staal

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

David Moss R, ARI 2010-11 Jordan Staal C, CAR
58 Games played 42
17 Goals 11
13 Assists 19
30 Points 30
0.52 Points per game 0.71
9 Plus/minus 7
127 Shots 91
13.4 Shooting % 12.1
92 Hits 70
18 Penalty minutes 24
13:41 Average ice time 21:21
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.2 Corsi for % 53.2
+3.8 CF% relative to team 0.0
56.1 Fenwick for % 51.0
57.9 Expected goals for % 47.9
+5.1 xGF% relative to team -3.3
61.2 Goals for % 53.2
101.7 PDO 101.3
161 Shot attempts taken 118
Expected goals, all situations
12.5 Expected goals 10.9
0.95 Expected goals per 60 0.73
7.4% Chance per attempt 9.2%
+4.5 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
+8.1 Goals above replacement +1.4
+1.4 Wins above replacement +0.2
+1.7 Even-strength offence +0.7
+2.9 Even-strength defence -1.9
+0.3 Power play -0.5
+0.6 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.4 Penalties +0.5

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean