Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Rick Nash Jeff Carter

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRick Nash: Goals, 0.43 a game, 97th percentileRick Nash: Assists, 0.45 a game, 87th percentileRick Nash: Points, 0.88 a game, 93rd percentileRick Nash: Shots, 4.07 a game, 99th percentileRick Nash: Hits, 1.21 a game, 55th percentileRick Nash: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 64th percentileRick Nash: CF% rel, 1.5, 60th percentileRick Nash: On-ice xG %, 51.2%, 56th percentileRick Nash: Rating, +10.6 goals above replacement, 90th percentileRick Nash: Chances created, 1.07 xG per 60, 90th percentileRick Nash: Shot quality, 6.1% a shot, 11th percentileRick Nash: Finishing, +2.7 goals above expected, 76th percentileJeff Carter: Goals, 0.45 a game, 97th percentileJeff Carter: Assists, 0.38 a game, 76th percentileJeff Carter: Points, 0.83 a game, 89th percentileJeff Carter: Shots, 4.19 a game, 99th percentileJeff Carter: Hits, 0.81 a game, 35th percentileJeff Carter: Corsi for %, 51.3%, 60th percentileJeff Carter: CF% rel, 3.1, 75th percentileJeff Carter: On-ice xG %, 54.4%, 80th percentileJeff Carter: Rating, +12.2 goals above replacement, 94th percentileJeff Carter: Chances created, 1.53 xG per 60, 99th percentileJeff Carter: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 79th percentileJeff Carter: Finishing, -3.1 goals above expected, 18th percentile
020406020406080Rick Nash 66Jeff Carter 66

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Rick Nash
Jeff Carter

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Rick Nash L, BOS 2010-11 Jeff Carter C, PIT
75 Games played 80
32 Goals 36
34 Assists 30
66 Points 66
0.88 Points per game 0.83
2 Plus/minus 27
305 Shots 335
10.5 Shooting % 10.7
91 Hits 65
34 Penalty minutes 39
18:56 Average ice time 18:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.7 Corsi for % 51.3
+1.5 CF% relative to team +3.1
50.9 Fenwick for % 51.5
51.2 Expected goals for % 54.4
+1.0 xGF% relative to team +5.2
53.1 Goals for % 64.9
100.7 PDO 104.1
362 Shot attempts taken 404
Expected goals, all situations
25.3 Expected goals 37.1
1.07 Expected goals per 60 1.53
6.1% Chance per attempt 8.3%
+2.7 Goals above expected -3.1
Rating, in goals
+10.6 Goals above replacement +12.2
+1.8 Wins above replacement +2.0
+7.9 Even-strength offence +6.9
-3.3 Even-strength defence +0.6
-0.2 Power play +1.1
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.5
+2.4 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$7.8M Cap hit $5M
$118K Cap dollars per point $76K
$5M Worth at the going rate $5.6M
-$2.8M Value: worth minus cap hit +$639K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean